Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

JFrankParnell

Published Letters: 243

  • Yeah, but Cheney doesn't have the same "manish scent" as Al.

    [Read the article: Al Gore in 2012?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    You're right. The smell emanating from Cheney would be either the drying blood of his victims, or more likely, the stench of decaying flesh common to the undead.

  • I find myself oddly conficted

    [Read the article: Quote of the day]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I find myself, for once, agreeing with the moronic pachyderm-(woe)man. Please Joe, state your true calling as a GOP'er! Disavow the so-called Democratic majority. I'd rather the fire cleanse the big tent of pseudo- and stealth- Republican'ts than allow that orally submissive fuktard Reid play the supplicant foil to Fuktard-in-Chief, Shrub.

    Then I find myself confused. I find myself thinking about me, myself, and I, more than anyone else, which puts me high in the running for the role of Joe Lieberman. Maybe I should run for President of Israe- I mean - 'Murica. I think that I am what we (I) should be for us (me), which is to say, I know what we (I) need, I mean, I know what we need to save us (me) from the horrors facing Isra- I mean, Amurica.

  • You misunderestimate him.

    [Read the article: The dismal state of George W. Bush]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    "Bush was, rather, driven by misinformation from within his own government;..."

    Wrong.

    Shrub knew what he was doing and still believes it to be the right thing. Bush isn't stupid, he's smart. He's smart and he's still wrong.

    We can play semanitics all day long, "evil", "stupid", "ignorant", doesn't matter because we can't know his intent except as he chooses to reveal it.

    What we can do, and must do, is judge him by his actions. He led us to war on false pretenses, then had the gall to mismanage that same war a in foolish gambit to annex the majority of the world's oil reserves. He committed multiple felonies by his own admission (FISA). He has exhibited bad faith and dishonesty at every turn during his rule.

    The Congress should impeach this lying sack of shit. Not because he deserves it, for he deserves a frog march to The Hague at best. Nor should The Congress impeach him for political gain. The Congress should impeach our lying sack of shit President because it is their duty and they owe it to any future generations that survive this travesty.

  • You misunderestimate him.

    [Read the article: The dismal state of George W. Bush]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    "Bush was, rather, driven by misinformation from within his own government;..."

    Wrong.

    Shrub knew what he was doing and still believes it to be the right thing. Bush isn't stupid, he's smart. He's smart and he's still wrong.

    We can play semanitics all day long, "evil", "stupid", "ignorant", doesn't matter because we can't know his intent except as he chooses to reveal it.

    What we can do, and must do, is judge him by his actions. He led us to war on false pretenses, then had the gall to mismanage that same war a in foolish gambit to annex the majority of the world's oil reserves. He committed multiple felonies by his own admission (FISA). He has exhibited bad faith and dishonesty at every turn during his rule.

    The Congress should impeach this lying sack of shit. Not because he deserves it, for he deserves a frog march to The Hague at best. Nor should The Congress impeach him for political gain. The Congress should impeach our lying sack of shit President because it is their duty and they owe it to any future generations that survive this travesty.

  • Maybe sometimes the market can be trusted.

    [Read the article: Republicans make Fox News sick]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    In this case, the invisible hand speaks truth: Fox's popularity is congruent with their true worth.

  • Glenn, I have to nitpick your choice of words

    [Read the article: Chris Wallace: Probing, hard-nosed journalist]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    You said, "Fox is obviously entitled to broadcast whatever propaganda it wants...."

    I must disagree. Murdock, Ailes, and Wallace are free to felate Shrub anytime on their own time, not mine.

    Fox, like every other broadcaster, uses our public airwaves and agrees to serve the public good as a condition of access. While I concede that particular clause is the appendix in the body of FCC regulation, that doesn't mean they are entitled to do using the public airwaves.

    Perhaps it's time to exercise that portion of the regulation with regard to their license?

    JFP

  • That never stopped them when it was a GOP press release.

    [Read the article: Hey, it worked for McCain]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    [Thus spake the corporate shill], "the letter was not a letter to the editor... It's a press release from the Clinton campaign."

    Because the M$M would never act as stenographers or propagandists.

  • What is it about what the Preacher said that so upsetting?

    [Read the article: The GOP attack plan for Barack Obama]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    That he said it, or that he's right?

  • re: Gwool

    [Read the article: The GOP attack plan for Barack Obama]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    "I have absolutely no doubt there will be distortions and falsehoods spread about BOTH candidates from the fringe elements of the respective parties."

    The GOP *is* a fringe element.

  • And exactly what is wrong with bashing Bush?

    [Read the article: Cheney's bogus oil argument]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    @-- Asher Steinberg

    Can one bash Bush too much? I think not. In fact, one might argue that for the sake of our country he hasn't been bashed enough.

  • Though they hunger for substance

    [Read the article: Ignore the McCain vs. Obama polls]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    .. they shall receive nothing but mindless drivel. So, the Gozilla vs Megalon of all horseraces is over, and the "news" networks still can't deliver substantive content. So much for the Invisible Hand working it's marketplace magic.

    Would it be too much to ask for a just a little substance? Is that too difficult a task? Is Obama the only person that's realized that after years of brain-numbing dissemination from the The Decider and his enabling minions that people, maybe, just maybe, can handle being treated as adults?

  • Wow, did I have Electro Robot wrong

    [Read the article: Biden responds to Lieberman's attack]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    All this time I was thoroughly enjoying [insert correct possessive pronoun here] posts, thinking that ER was doing a parody of a right-wing idjit.

    Just goes to show how hard it is to be a satirist these days. Among other things.

  • One (minor) quibble

    [Read the article: Scott McClellan on the "liberal media"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    GG wrote:

    "The primary reason why this preposterous myth persists is because the media generally refuses to engage in any self-examination."

    I'd change this to:

    "The primary reason why this preposterous myth persists is because the media generally refuses to engage in any MEANINGFUL self-examination."

    Oh they love to talk about themselves in the most trite of ways that define narcissism, but rarely does the discerning eye of a critic go unpoked.

  • 'pushback' =

    [Read the article: Push-back against McClellan book begins]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    lying

    cya'ing

    I like Rove's version of Subliminal Man:

    Scott wasn't in any of those meetings, (that I recall).

    I didn't break the law at all (that I recall).

    I didn't do anything evil (that I recall).

Most Active Stories

Read More

Letters Help

Daily Delivery

Salon headlines in your mailbox