- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 2
gene says:
"No one has mentioned the fact that Manjoo amply lays out all his sources with connecting links (he even warns you when the file is huge) so that you can verify his sources, and at the same time Kennedy does no such thing."
Yet when I read the RS article, I found every page thoroughly footnoted, over 200 notes in all. Did gene read the article, or just hop on the first cart going in the direction he liked?
Mark Crispin Miller says the election was stolen, and seems to document it; Manjoo says Nuh Uh.
Kennedy says the election was stolen, and seems to document it; Manjoo says Nuh Uh.
Surely you have another voice we can hear from? I tend to skip Manjoo's writings as not much different from what I can find in the mainstream. Can you not find another viewpoint than this apparently reflexive naysayer?
