Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
stich
Published Letters: 2
This article contains the claim "Americans who eat poultry, dairy and eggs, but not red meat, are responsible for fewer greenhouse gases than those who consume a vegetarian diet that includes dairy and eggs."
Can someone explain to me how this makes sense? Everything else being equal, if you eat poultry, you are responsible for fewer greenhouse gases than someone who doesn't eat poultry? Is this what is being claimed or am I missing something?
This is just another example of the media concentrating on style and not substance of candidates and their approach to issues. No wonder we have to look back on eight years of Bush, eight years of Clinton, and eight years of Reagan. I can't wait for the general election, when the talk in the media will be about which candidate you would rather have a beer with.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
