Letters to the Editor
Rubick Cube
Published Letters: 53
-
The Well Has Run Dry
[Read the article: My boyfriend danced dirty to make me jealous ]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Oh, Cary, Cary, Cary.
Let me help you out.
Try one of these next time:
"Dear Cary, I'm a successful band leader of a local night club and my wife, a crazy read-head, is always trying to get into my show. What should I do?"
"Dear Cary, my husband is always threatening to 'send me to the moon' (read 'domestic violence) whenever he comes home from driving a bus. What should I do?"
"Dear Cary, my best friend is leather jacket wearing, motorcyle riding thug who thinks all women love him and wants to be called 'The Fonz', like he's cool or something. What should I do?"
"Dear Cary, I'm a sherrif of a small, country town and my deputy is so incompetent, he gives law-enforcement a bad name. What should I do?"
I'll have to do some more 'research' if you need more stuff, ok?
*flips through his tv guide*
-
To All You SHrillary Supporters...
[Read the article: The Obama photo flap]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]... you know who you are.
(W.E.S, AkaSmith, etc...)
I really love the "Babe in the Woods" tactic being bandied about... "the pic is divisive? really? I don't understand..."
And I also love the, "PROVE IT CAME FROM HILLARY HERSELF!!! WHERE ARE HER FINGERPRINTS? WHERE ARE THE PHOTOS OF HER SENDING IT AN EMAIL? WHERE!?!?!?"
My God, you people are so enjoyably transparent, it's funny!
So here's the response you keep over looking:
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN IS NOT DENYING THE STORY!!!
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN....
I trust you get the point?
Good.
-
Do We Need Any More Proof...
[Read the article: The dude vote]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]... that Salon is part of Hillary's Campaign machine?
This has got to be one of the worst pieces of... what... journalism?... tabloid trash.... how about just plain ole CRAP?
I never thought I'd see the day when one could point to something and declare that the National Enquirer has higher journalistic standards.
What was this crap, anyway?
"Buddy-cop" political analogy? "No Girls Allowed" boys club?
Frankly, I'm shocked you didn't make any references to that famous, male-chauvinistic television show, THE LITTLE RASCALS....
This was lamer than the Obama pic.
Way to go!
-
Memo From Sen Clinton
[Read the article: The dude vote]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Dear Supporters,
Please be sure to counter-post on Ed McClelland's column, (or any other Salon Column, for that matter), any posts that are critical our of our cause.
We need volume, so make them quick and to the point.
For instance, here's some examples: "Gosh, Ed, you're right on the money. I hadn't thought of it like that."
or
"Thank you, Ed, for that timely post. I AGREE!!"
or
"You know, I used to be an Obamaniac... until I read your article. Thank you, Ed, for opening my eyes!"
or
"Ed, because of your brilliant and intuitive column, I'm writting a check to Hillary... RIGHT NOW!!!"
And please don't waste precious time trying to answer any of the points our critics are making.
Remember... it's about volume!!!
Thank you,
Hillary.
-
@ArtTx
[Read the article: The dude vote]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Wow... right on cue!
You do realize the post of subj "Memo From Sen Clinton" wasn't really from Clinton, right?
You do realize that was a satirical post, right?
-
A serious question
[Read the article: Tom the Dancing Bug]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Why do Super Delegates only exist in the Democratic Primaries?
-
@Over
[Read the article: Tom the Dancing Bug]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]So... we have Super Delegates to protect us... from what?
-
The Three C's
[Read the article: My beautiful, drug-addicted boy]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]''You didn't cause it, you can't control it, and you can't cure it.''
Mr. Sheff mentioned that the only advice he would gravitate to was advice that re-inforced what he already wanted to do....
Hello?
Am I the only one who noticed this common thread to through his *entire* story?
On the other hand, he outright dismissed any adviced that seemed too cold or too mean.
Perhaps a little "tough love" would be a possible solution?
Sometimes, when we think with our hearts instead of our heads, we end up doing more harm than someone's worst enemy.
In other words, maybe it's time you should ask yourself if you are enabling your son?
However, this would run contrary to the Three C's... that being that you are actually causing, or at least helping, your son's addiction.
-
@AnnaHadWolves
[Read the article: It ain't over yet]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"Those of us who have been fighting the Republican dirty tricks and soulless despoilatry for probably as long as you Gen-Y people have even been on Earth appreciate your fire, your passion and your ardor"
Gosh, so fight fire with fire, eh?
Anna, before you have any more puppies, could you please explain to us neophytes the difference between the Democratic "more experienced types" and the Republican Party?
Because the message of HRC is beginning to sound a lot like, "It takes a Republican to fight a Republican!"
I mean, if that's the case... why even vote?
-
@AnnaHadWolves
[Read the article: It ain't over yet]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"Thanks for your semi-attention."
Oh, yes... us Y-Gen types totally appreciate condescension cuz it's like, so cool! Oh my God! Totally! *giggle*
-
Huh?
[Read the article: Who would the GOP rather face?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Can someone please explain the following link:
http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/clinton-camp-says-obama-must-pass-national-security-threshold-to-be-veep-2008-03-10.html
What exactly does Hillary mean when she says she would consider Obama *IF* he passed some sort of "National Security" test?
Are they going to check him for explosives every time he enters the White House?
Can someone please explain this to me?
(And please, no more "omg! Hillary Hater!" responses, ok? please?)
-
@Clockwork Smurf
[Read the article: Who would the GOP rather face?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"We will have to see exactly where the New York Senator's feelings truly lie."
Yeah, because she's been *so* ambigious about her *true* feeling lately, RIGHT?
I mean, I was just thinking, "Gosh, I wonder how Hillary really feels about Obama..."
Thank you for verbalizing what many of us were thinking but simply didn't have the courage to do so.
