Letters to the Editor
Rubick Cube
Published Letters: 65
-
@KStone
[Read the article: The ballad of Ramos and Compean]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"The case against them seemed to be pretty overwhelimg and for prosecutors to try them and a judge to sentence them to serious time in an infamously law enforcement friendly state like Texas should indicate how egregious their actions were in the matter."
THAT'S THE POINT... THAT'S THE EVER-LOVING F*CKING POINT!!!
Find another case where a Law Enforcement officer, IN ANY STATE, has ever gotten this type of sentence. You wont find it!
My God, what needs to happen before people realize that these two guys were singled out for political reasons!?!? They were railroaded! THEY WERE MADE EXAMPLES TO SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE TO OTHER BORDER PATROL AGENTS: HANDS OF ILLIGALS.
Especially when you have cold-blooded killers getting a few years in prison for ACTUALLY KILLING SOMEONE... almost daily!?!?!
Are you being purposely obtuse?
-
Fred Doesn't really need a campaign...
[Read the article: Fred Thompson is just like you]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]... when he's got Salon.
The only thing that will mobilize conservatives even more than a Hillary Clinton candidancy is the huge outpouring of panic by Salon readers.
Honestly, all he needs to do is just to link this entire thread and many more articles my Michael Scherer, plus Michael Moore "challenges", on his website. No endorsement from the right, be it Phyllis Schaffly or Dr. James Dobson, could possible begin to work half as good.
wow!
-
If you were serving on a Klingon ship...
[Read the article: My friend suddenly died -- and I think I want his job!]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I'll never forget what Lt. Worf said when Deanna Troy asked him how he felt about inheriting a job as a result of a friend's death. "Promotion due to the death of a crewmate is commonplace on Klingon ships."
So, my advice to you is it's ok to get your friend's job... if you are serving on a Klingon ship. Are you?
No?
Then... YUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!! OMG, how disgusting!!!
The only response I saw that made *ANY* sense was from wildmarjoram.
Holy Cow, how creepy!
-
RFLMAO
[Read the article: The Internet is making us stupid]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Irony, thy name is Heuvelen!
Here's my favorite quote from *this* particular article:
"A liberal might argue, though, that liberals are by definition more diversity-minded and more tolerant of the views of others."
RFLMAO!!!!
That just made my day.
Thanks!
-
BURN BABY BURN
[Read the article: On the fake campaign trail]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]To all of you who are shocked, just shocked at how Salon and its readers readily dismiss HRC's
decietfulness... you're definitely plants.
Puuuleeezzee!!
Hillary could set a live baby on fire on national TV and Salon would already have
an article posted on its website explaining how baby-burning is more common and socially accepted
than most people realize... even before the infant's flames have extinguised.
And you'd hear the same rhetoric you hear now... "could we PLEASE just focus on the issues and
quit HILLARY BASHING!?!?"... all sorts of lengthy explanations of, "sure, it may be wrong, but
I'm still voting for her because she's better than the alternative" types.
You'd see the endless lists of evils of Republican administrations, followed by the rhetorical
question, "is one burning-baby really worth all of this?"
And, before you know it, *that* would become their campaign slogan: Sure, she may burn babies,
but at least she's not a Republican!!! VOTE HILLARY NOW!!!
Personally, I just read Salon for the entertainment value... especially the letters.
-
BURN BABY BURN
[Read the article: On the fake campaign trail]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]To all of you who are shocked, just shocked at how Salon and its readers readily dismiss HRC's decietfulness... you're definitely plants.
Puuuleeezzee!!
Hillary could set a live baby on fire on national TV and Salon would already have an article posted on its website explaining how baby-burning is more common and socially accepted than most people realize... even before the infant's flames have extinguised.
And you'd hear the same rhetoric you hear now... "could we PLEASE just focus on the issues and quit HILLARY BASHING!?!?"... all sorts of lengthy explanations of, "sure, it may be wrong, but I'm still voting for her because she's better than the alternative" types.
You'd see the endless lists of evils of Republican administrations, followed by the rhetorical question, "is one burning-baby really worth all of this?"
And, before you know it, *that* would become their campaign slogan: Sure, she may burn babies, but at least she's not a Republican!!! VOTE HILLARY NOW!!!
Personally, I just read Salon for the entertainment value... especially the letters.
-
Americans are scared of Hillary....
[Read the article: Heartbreak ahead for Hillary Clinton?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]...and not because she's a woman. Believe me, gender isn't even a factor here because nothing about Hillary reminds anyone about her gender. I'd say even Bill isn't sure she *is* a woman.
She's this shrill, ambitious, hysterical, maniacal, arrogant, and elitist thing who slams down anyone who dares to stand in her way.
Hell, even Bill is terrified of her... and it shows!!!
So if her own husband, a two-term popular ex-president, is terrified of this person, how else is the rest of America supposed to view her?
I just think it's hilarious how some posters are trying to portray her as this warm and caring human being.
Let me know how that works out, ok?
-
Throw him a Curve Ball...
[Read the article: Some drunken chick is texting my husband while we're sleeping]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I've read *sooooo* many responses telling you to leave him.
Boring.
Now, for something totally different: Tell him you have had an epiphany. Tell him you don't mind if he has sex with other women... in fact, you'd like to start encouraging him. You've decided that this whole "monogamy" thing is causing unnecessary friction in your relationship and it would be a shame to let anything get in the way of yours and his happiness. Just tell him that the only thing you *do* require is that he engages in safe-sex. After all, none of your partners mind wearing a rubber, why should he, right?
Then see what he says. And let us know... please.
-
How about this:
[Read the article: Hillary Clinton's softer side]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Have Bill, swear under oath, in a court of law, on a Bible, that his wife DOES have a softer side.
That should carry some weight.