Letters to the Editor
Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
wallflute
Published Letters: 1
Page 1
-
Genesis is not self-consistent when interpreted literally
[Read the article: Inside the Creation Museum]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]How do those who claim Genesis should be interpreted literally resolve the inconsistencies between the different chapters?
In Chapter 1, man is created after the plants and animals, whereas in Chapter 2, man is created before them. I like to think this was done deliberately in order to discourage literal interpretation.
Page 1