Who am I to stop him?

heru

I truly don't know what you're trying to put across. You posted what you posted. It was as clear as can be. I replied to it in a way that was as clear as could be. I asked you to explain where I supposedly misunderstood what you posted. You, instead, wrote some silly junk that was supposed to insult me that had nothing to do with the discussion. Please either reply to the question or don't. If you choose not to, the discussion is concluded.

-- Kitt

Ok, let us look at your foul work this night.

First we have a question to the group by a regular that one can trust to be honest and to ask honest questions. Iokannan in the Well asked "What can/should we expect from President Obama here?"

I responded that one could expect Obama to throw us "under the bus" as that is what the history of modern presidents tell us they all do. To keep little assholes from purposely misreading my meaning, I included "Does that mean I am for McCain? Hell no." since Glenn's experience here tells us that people like you will do their best to read into other's words whatever they can to wrap the meaning.

Then I wrote, "It means that, with the possible exception of Jimmy Carter, every president in my lifetime has been a lying bag of dirt. I see no reason to expect otherwise from the next guy" which is based on a lifetime of observing campaign promises verses how the winner governs. That is an indictment of presidents from Ike to Bush. (do try to comprehend)

Then, to support that contention with but one example of many, I remind the readers that even that odious Bush ran as an anti-war candidate by writing, "Hell, even that warmongering, murdering, bulling Bush promised a much more "humble" foreign policy than that of the Clintons. Did it work out? Not so much."

Now, how any thinking human (but this requires honesty) could possible come here and take from the above a comparison of Bush and Obama such as your "Using the dishonesty of the deranged imbecile George Bush in order to gauge how bad Obama might turn out to be hardly seems reasonable" is way beyond me.

However, even worse is to call me dishonest in that first post of yours, and then whine latter, "... [that I] wrote some silly junk that was supposed to insult me that had nothing to do with the discussion ..." when clearly you hurled the first insult. And to claim that your juvenile misreadings were a "discussion" is the mindset of one who needs to seek help.

I hate to say it (no, really), but you are an idiot or you are playing one tonight. Are you drinking?

I see that lumping Obama in with all the other presidents turns your world upside down. Well, we both know that Obama should win in a easy victory and then govern with a majority in the congress.

Time will tell how many of us he tosses under the buss. I look forward to your whining in a year or so when he invades some country on the other side of the planet and tells us it is to "keep us safe".

Why? You really are way off your game tonight. (whatever foul game that might be)

All the little odious Jebbie wrote was, "Please do us all a favor and ignore that piece of shit you're arguing with." I felt it well within my right to hit him back with a prediction. Are you now going to play Miss Manners after your earlier gambit?

Note: Before other fools write, I like Ms. Manners and have read her book. My wife is a big fan and to compare someone to Ms. Manners elevates the target and does not damage Ms. Manner's reputation at all. (shame the obvious often needs a preemptive clarification here; so many fools)

My apologies for the mistake. I would go into a long, long bit to cover but I am not the type. I screwed up. Sorry.

I knew that Jebbie wasn't talking about you. It was you who misunderstood.Also, see C.O. post.

So? That is between he and I. You are still a jerk and I think you were calling me dishonest in that first post as well as Bush. In fact, I never compared Bush and Obama directly as you tried to make it look like; and then you tried to make it look like I was as dishonest as that creep Bush. Jones can think as he pleases.

Let us just say I hate it when I see your name in reply to me in any manner. You are everything that has keep the left down for 40 years. However, I do not have the energy today to explain why that is; perhaps on another thread.

Please pardon my lack of reading comprehension abilities but, wasn't that basically, once again, comparing Obama to Bush? Just like I 'comprehended' from the quote of yours last time that you got so all fired mad at me about?

-- Kitt

I see no reason to pardon you.

I will attempt to explain in "little kids" language so that even you might comprehend. I started off by prediction the future by supposing past trends continue. I used all the presidents from Ike to Bush to set the baseline and concluded that the next fellow (or gal) will continue the same horror. I explicitly said that all presidents, with the possible exception of Carter, lied and did not govern by the principles they promised. That's life in the empire; get over it.

I realize that for an Obama lover with blinders on that this all seems to be only about Obama --- but that is the problem of you Obama cultists.