Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

angw

Published Letters: 2
Editor's Choice: 1

Thursday, February 15, 2007 09:49 PM

An Unnecessary Win for the Religious Right

While I feel for Amanda, (and Melissa) I can't help but feel that they (and the Edwards campaign) gave in far too easily.

Look, dirty campaigning and smear campaigning are a fact of political life, and it's neither a new phenomenon nor something that Republican's have a lock on. I don't say that to defend it (or Donohue, whose views I find abhorrent) but because I'm surprised at the surprise Amanda expressed over the level of vitriol. And while the content of the attacks may have taken a specific tact because she was female, I don't think the attacks would necessarily have been lessened had a liberal male blogger who had written some of the same things been selected for the position.

Look, Amanda, this was a dream job in some ways, but as an astute observer of the culture in general and politics in particular, you can't have gone into this with your eyes closed. Walking away so soon only fuels the fire and hands Donohue an easy and early victory. Politics is ugly. That's not right, it's not the way it should be, and the attacks on you were wrong. Still, while acknowledging that it's easy for me to say because I'm not in your shoes, I think you let yourself down by not fighting harder for this. It was a great job and a chance to do something that made a difference, and you let Donohue win with hardly a fight.

Of course, to be fair, Edwards should have handled this completely differently. For starters, the Catholic League is not likely to turn out to vote for Edwards anyway, and giving in to pressure from a sexist, homophobic religious organization certainly doesn't appeal to Edward's core constituency.I think that Edwards should have approached this as a non-negotiable, defended Amanda and Melissa's ability to do the job they were hired to do, and otherwise ignored it.

It's a shame that Donohue won this round so easily.

Friday, July 25, 2008 07:31 AM
Original article: Hang up and drive

What's the difference between talking on the cellphone, listening to the radio, or talking to others in the car?

I'd like to know if any research has been done relating to other in-car distractions. If 40% of your attention is diverted when you are talking on the cellphone, how does this compare to other common in car activities, such as listening to the radio, or mediating an argument between children?

If I am listening to "Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me," which asks me to listen to statements and evaluate whether or not they are true, does that mean I am essentially driving drunk? And if so, why the outcry over cellphone usage now, rather than over the radio or a thousand other distractions? And if that is not true, then what differentiates the distraction level from cell usage vs. all the other distractions one encounters while driving?

Most Active Letters Threads

725

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
255

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
183

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon