Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

StephenAshley

Published Letters: 71

Monday, November 23, 2009 02:01 PM

Boy.

All these people are going to look back at the Beck years in a couple decades and be so embarrassed. He'll be the polyester leisure suit to an entire generation of once-whacked right wing adherents.

Saturday, November 21, 2009 06:24 PM

I stopped watching the season

about five episodes in when I realized there was literally not a single person I was interested in.

But I can point out how hilarious it was watching that person on the last page try and defend LA's culture with a sad little list starting with Disney and ending with "we have lots of books."

Friday, November 20, 2009 09:54 AM

Are you kidding me?

Salon is getting very good at hiring professional trolls as supposed writers. From the opening sentence on this article is clear crap from beginning to end.

You don't need to go any further than the author's fantasy that Palin actually wrote the book. The lady can't construct a complete sentence, but sure, she hammered out 400 pages all on her own.

This is a waste of bandwidth.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:33 AM

Well sure

But that economist would obviously be a socialist, and we don't do anything socialist in America land of the free home of the brave STAND UP COUNTRY MUSIC AWARDS WHOO.

Monday, November 16, 2009 10:23 PM

@aeschylus

Please. I think it is very clear that acknowledgement of the dangers of blind adherence to authority out of peer pressure is one of the most useful things we might teach an American citizen these days.

Thursday, November 12, 2009 02:28 PM

Correction

The 'War on Terrorism', including actions in Afghanistan, came close to topping $1 trillion under Bush's watch, and by some estimates far exceeded that amount.

Thursday, November 12, 2009 02:26 PM

@nattyJ

You couldn't be more wrong. The Iraq war alone nearly topped $1 trillion during Bush's tenure. You'll remember that the $700 billion bailout was also under Bush's watch. Couple those two figures alone with his aggressive tax reduction policy and you don't need to go any further.

Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:45 AM

All you have to do

is look at the last 15 years to see what deficit reduction means in America.

Clinton was terrified of the deficit hawks, and in fabricating his fantasy whereby the government spends less on everything but Defense he initiated the stagnation of the American middle class just in time for the GOP to take office and run up the largest increase in budget deficits any of us have seen in our lifetimes.

The stats say it all. We've spent the last 15 years treading economic water. If you're not in the top 1-2% of income earners you are now worth less in relative terms than your parents were.

There is not a single example of reduced-governmental-spending-for-reduced-governmental-spending's sake that has led to economic benefit. Not one.

Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:38 AM

@Brian

You're falling for the fallacy inherent in the deficit bogeyman.

The Department of Defense is the budget buster for this country. Take any two, three, even four or more government departments, lump their budgets together, and they will still be wildly outpaced by Defense spending.

There is no such thing as deficit control when the biggest slice of our GDP pie by an order of magnitude is wrapped up in the one department with the least to say about government policies which directly encourage long term economic growth.

Deficit reduction means nothing of the sort. It's simple code for the GOP's obsession with neutering the government's functions in all areas except Defense.

Deficit reduction as practiced by our political class has absolutely nothing to do with safeguarding economic vitality. In fact it's quite the opposite. It'll all come down to underfunding vitally necessary domestic programs and stripping the funding out of our already anemic regulatory efforts, which is the problem that has us all in this mess to begin with.

Deficit reduction will not buy a more secure economic future, it will buy a guarantee that we'll be back in this exact same position within a decade, two at most.

Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:26 AM

Rahm needs to go.

Mistake number one in the Obama administration, and when it comes time to take an historical accounting of why this White House's first priority has always been to bend over backwards for a neutered and utterly wrecked GOP he will be causal factor number one.

Obama's base spent two years railing heartily against all that Clintonist political compromises had cost this country and the Democratic party in supporting his candidacy and he repaid us by hiring the king of the "be a cynic and never stop being terrified of the Right's retribution" philosophy.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:32 AM
Original article: Pelosi's victory for women

I finally get it

Paglia is a professional troll. Every discussion forum on the internet has at least two or three people who must be envious as hell, they only wish they could make millions doing what she does.

Friday, November 6, 2009 12:31 PM

Spoincey

Is clearly an idiot.

How he got out a line like this "In the first place, there is no such a place as Palestine and there never has been. It was a totally made up word by an English military officer at the beginning of the last century." when Israel never existed except in the minds of those who wished it until the middle of the last century is hilarious.

Hi. Lar. I. Ous.

Thursday, November 5, 2009 10:33 AM

I frankly long for the days

when we were satisfied with waging our religious war on Islam via Israeli proxy. If there's one thing the neoconservatives can be proud of it's how successful they were in thoroughly indoctrinating millions of Americans in the dogma of unflagging, unthinking support of the Israeli state and all its actions, even when those actions are in direct conflict with American goals as stated by both Bush administrations.

I guess when it comes to supporting unbridled Israeli expansion into Palestinian holdings even the Bushies weren't righteous enough, eh guys?

The really hilarious thing is if Bob and Sonny were to move to Israel they'd find themselves immediately marginalized as the extremist kooks they are even within the Israeli population. Actual Israelis, at least, are willing to cast a pragmatic eye on the actions of their government as it related to regional peace. Clearly vast swathes of this country are not.

Thursday, November 5, 2009 02:24 AM

If only

she had the courage to sing a full stanza without autotune.

Most Active Letters Threads

561

Everybody hates mommy

We're "stroller Nazis." We're whiny "breeders." Why is there so much contempt for mothers these days?
330

The extreme secrecy of the federal courts

Judges are not only permitted, but required, to conceal anything the government declares to be secret.
304

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
214

Praying for Obama's death

Pastors are invoking Psalm 109 -- "May his days be few" -- in hopes of saving our country, and our souls
162

Explaining ClimateGate: A history of distrust

Asking researchers to delete e-mails after receiving an FOI request is never a good idea. So why did it happen?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon