- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 1
nothing wrong with the article as such except that the author neglects to mention that much of the truth about 911 as revealed in 'Loose Change' and the other films is based on eyewitness accounts in interviews that took place on street level as the 'event' was going on. so in my view it's not only about biased interpretation of the video itself but of the sum of testimony, the interviews given by people who were in the building, interviews given by the firefighters and other rescue workers, even the guys who were in the basement levels of the two towers shortly before impact. not to mention the fact that demolition experts have also given what we maybe could agree is reliable testimony to the facts as they are, ie the buildings coming down at freefall speed, molten metal being found in the footprints long after the jet fuel is gone, etc.
each time one of these articles come out that purports to debunk the 'truth movement', it makes it more apparent to me that some people just cannot del with the *TRUTH'. the truth is that there are more holes in the 'official' story that the supposed ' conspiracy theory'. the 911 commission neglected the issues i have just named and even though the crime of the century was committed before our very eyes, no one was punished for their acquiescence or incompetence.
one more thing...dick and shrub meeting together, in order to keep their side of the story straight? remember that.
