Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

rebecalouise

Published Letters: 187
Editor's Choice: 9

Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:51 PM

MSNBC chat

First: I do NOT think there is a racist bone in the Clinton's bodies or in the bodies of any of their supporters.

But, I have been watching the MSNBC coverage all morning -- I am stuck -- for family reasons in a hotel room all day...

It was interesting that when there were 2 black men and a Southern man, Scarborough -- who mostly drives me batty -- and Mika and Shuster chatting -- it was the 2 African-Americans and Southerner who talked about how racial code words were being used against Obama.

As someone who has lived in a Southern state more than 10 years, I am afraid that Mika and Shuster just didn't really "get it."

But, I believe that after these political pros discovered they could disconcert some non-black voters and get Obama "off message" -- with the help of the MSM -- they kept it up.

But, again, I think it is simply political opportunism. Not racism.

But, how would Clinton supporters like it if Obama mentioned that he couldn't wait to invite Bill Clinton to the White House to have a nice "cigar?" Or if Obama mentioned that he envied Hillary ability to forgive because it might make her the best person to negotiate peace treaties with all of our former enemies?

These might be valid issues to bring up because the GOP will likely bring them up in the General Election but that doesn't make them ethical in a Primary Election. There are good ways to win and there are bad ways to win.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 01:14 PM

@ pieceofcake

First, Senator Obama identifies himself as an African-American.

Second, he truly is an "African-American," as the child of an African father and American mother.

I suppose we could call him a Kenyan-American, but it is more common to use the term "Hispanic-American" than Colombian-American so it has precedence.

Saturday, January 26, 2008 01:56 PM

@ pieceofcake

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Do we call Anglo-Indians White Anglo-Indians or Asian Indian-Anglos -- depending on which parent is what?

My mother is "white" and my father is "Latino" or Hispanic -- whatever you want to say. I identify myself as a Latina or just as an American. Or as an Hispanic-American -- depending on the circumstances. Not by the ethnicity of my one parent or another. But it is MY choice.

A person who comes from Ireland may or may not call themselves Irish-American -- it is up to them.

It all depends on so many factors. But, self-identity is the most important factor.

But, go ahead and be Contrarian.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 08:20 AM

Pathetic and unjust...

My 21 year old son grows more and more disillusioned about Hillary Clinton every day. While I know I will vote for whoever the Dem candidate is, he says he will sit out the race if Hillary is the candidate.

He believes HRC is showing a "win at all costs" side that convinces him that her presidency will be a continuation of the "Bush Regime." It is hard to argue with him after HRC's "Florida Gambit."

The only fair way to let Michigan and Floria's delegates "count" would be to strip them of half their delegates and then give half to each candidate -- RIGHT DOWN THE MIDDLE.

Thus punishing each state while keeping things fair for both candidates.

Then, maybe my idealistic young son will feel comfortable voting for the party's candidate -- whoever he or she may be.

Saturday, February 2, 2008 08:28 AM
Original article: Pulling out the big guns

Lose his anti-war credentials...and honor?

If Bill Richardson does not endorse Barack Obama before the New Mexico primary -- it means he did not seriously mean it when he ran as the "Anti-War" candidate.

I like Richardson and my family is from New Mexico -- but this will be very sad, indeed.

So, again, Bill: a potential cabinet postion -- or integrity about the war? Which is it? These are the moments where character counts and destiny calls. You seem to have chosen ambition over honor.

Tragic.

Sunday, February 3, 2008 03:41 PM

To zoetrope1

Hillary was happy to mention her endorsements from RFK Jr., Kathleen Kennedy Townsend and Kerry Kennedy. It is part of the political game. Don't sound so bitter.

Monday, February 4, 2008 04:46 PM

This is pathetic: You vote for the person whose policies you support!!

You don't vote for Granny, for Mommy or for anyone else. If you vote for anyone -- vote for your children or for the children of the people around you.

Who will make the world a better place?

Who will get us out of the war?

Who will lead this country into a better tomorrow.

For God's sake -- you don't vote to make a political statement about "who you are!"

Grow up Rebecca!!!

It isn't a high school election This is real life.

Wednesday, February 6, 2008 10:30 AM

Well, Rebecca, I guess we know who YOU voted for...

Obama got most of the Red and Purple States, Obama got more Latinos that HRC got African Americans, Obama got more Independents and Under 30 year olds than HRC got women...

Hillary was "relieved" to win "traditional," overwhelmingly Democratic States.

Gee, I wonder who is in a better position to beat McCain?

Hillary cares more about herself than about the Party and winning a big victory in November.

And Hillary winning will not look like the "First American Woman President" to people overseas. She will look like "Another wife or family member of a rich, powerful Leader of one Party taking office after the Opposing Party loses favor." Nothing historic about that in the Third World!

Such a shame for women in our country...

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
421

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon