Pitching lessons to improve his aim.

than what we shouldn't laugh at.

The ad copy for this is a pants wetter. Just the lift I needed in pre-holiday craziness.

Somebody at Salon forward this line to Greenwald.

"The promises of transparency were undercut, just a little, by the fact that the orders Obama had signed weren't posted on the White House Web site by the close of business Wednesday. In fact, the text of Tuesday's inaugural address didn't show up until sometime after lunch Wednesday."

Yep, there goes transparency. I mean it couldn't have anything to do with a new administration still finding their feet. Editing, anyone?

to hear Broadsheet staff smacking a collective high five.

Now for the sound of Ms. Walsh smacking her lips on that plate of crow.

bitch slaps that dumb bastard out of the park.

It's misleading. It makes it sound as if the Times is editorializing against the limit instead of quoting execs who are against it.

Here's what the line reads:

not made "for" white people

Does anyone understand what irony means?

For Christ's fucking sake.

Obama releases secret Bush memos AP

Boy, JW just can't get over Hillary losing, can she? How many more of these limp attacks coming?

Taking "deepthink" from David Sirota seriously.

it's close to German for "black," anybody using it as Mason did who claims not to be using it in a racist way is lying.

for the average troll who thinks the world need his opinion to get on and express doubts about a movie he hasn't seen. But, Raphael, aren't you allegedly a critic? Or is that an alleged critic?

Another one with too much time on his hands. Blackwell, can't you go clean the lint out of the clothes dryer or something.

MI5. MI6. No one going to see this gives a shit.

End of discussion.

that can claim the genesis of this brilliant book deserves to congratulate itself. It's a fine, fine piece of journalism.

It can be either, or both, or neither. Williams is having a response to one performer here, contrasting her with today's prefab porn bunnies. That you assume she has a doctrinaire response to porn is your presumption -- it is nowhere in her writing.

Traister believes politicians should have a private sex life but is bothered by Spitzer's hypocrisy.

Who's the real hypocrite here?

One scary bit with Kirk being chased by a dinosaur-like creature. Nothing bad happens, and it's brief, though intense. I don't think, if she likes Star Trek, that's going to ruin the nine-year-old's enjoyment.

"There is absolutely no way a normal, adjusted human being cannot like "WALL-E" or "Up". There. Is. Not."

Sure, pal. No way a normal, adujusted human being can have an opinion different from you. And if a critic doesn't like a heartwarming movie, she must be losing her soul. Or a snob. Or a cynic.

Someone wake me when the Village Idiot Convention leaves town.

grow up you whining little pissant.

that it is a ban on women's freedom to prevent them from wearing the burqa assumes that they are free to choose not to wear it.

Imagine, a place where there's no chance of reading Sirota . . .

Somewhere, over the rainbow, way up high . . .

can anyone tell me why Olson is taking this case?

Show me a culture where women are prevented from leaving the house if they don't wear Jimmy Choo's or skinny jeans. Sarkizy has this one exactly right.

until I do.

This isn't journalism.

The Girthers! HAHAHA!

Is there anything more disgusting than someone who insists on the supreriority of their grief?

If subscribers go away because they can't tolerate an opinion different from their own, a publication is better off without them. Extortion is never a good way to put your idea across.

In the UK, what I'll politely call "the c-word" is gender free. Men as well as women can be c _ _ _ s. The nasty negative letters to this sweet-spirited articlt up front us of the wisdom of the Brits. You're a bunch of . . .

how nobody criticizes the Policeman's Union for their support of Crowley even though they didn't have all the facts. But then they weren't an uppity black president forgetting himself.

Gene Lyons should be ashamed of this piece.

You're my hero.

"Mothers Who Eat Their Children: Crime or Feminist Tragedy?"

the fact that Olbermann attacked O'Reilly is proof that he complied with an order NOT to attack O'Reilly? And the proof that there was a deal comes from an anonymous source used by a lawyer-playing-journaliist who has always lambasted actual journalists for using anonymous sources. Delicious.

Because the reviewer praises this performance for "lightness and outright glee" doesn't mean she expected that in "Doubt."

The reviewer is referring to a scene -- one scene -- where Child is sad because her sister gets pregnant. She wasn't putting blame on her, and the movie isn't involved in some family-values conspiracy. Take a pill, for crissakes.

that Hillary graciously shook the kid's hand on her way out -- presumably after being told of the translator's mistake.

I agree that the response to her response is sexist. But let's hope Broadsheet says so when -- inevitably -- Maureen Dowd uses it to bash Hillary again. Just as she used Bill's trip to N. Korea to bash her.

tolerance and diversity of opinion honored as usual by the ayatollahs who post in letters.

Do you ever get tired of opening your pie hole to bitch about movies you haven't seen yet?

If you want to complain about somebody's opinion, get off your ass and see the thing first.

Vivid, the largest porn company, requires condoms.