Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Greeneyedkzin

Published Letters: 1036
Editor's Choice: 27

Thursday, April 17, 2008 12:28 PM
Original article: My beautiful mommy

Can you say "overreaction"?

When I was a child and my mother had dental surgery, I was shocked to come home and find her in bed in the middle of the day. She explained she'd been to the dentist, she hurt, and she needed me to play quietly. Fine. When I was a teen, she told me that if I wanted a nose job, it would be fine. When a classmate had breast-reduction surgery, she explained that the girl had been in pain and people had laughed at her.

These things can be dealt with rationally without traumatizing a young person or without making him or her feel as if s/he is a commodity.

What distresses me is the sort of censoriousness I detect here. Which surgeries would you sanction? Is a nosejob okay if you have a deviated septum? I gather that breast augmentation is Bad. What about breast reconstruction? If a tummy tuck is Wrong, how about a C-section.

There is a difference between getting some facial work done and coming out looking like Jocelyne Wildenstein.

No, I haven't had any plastic surgery, cellulite removal, or even Botox. But if I did, it would be the concern only of myself, my insurance provider (which doesn't handle cosmetic procedures) and as much gentleness as I could muster to explain it to a child.

We can't all write poetry like Cyrano de Bergerac, you know. Or hold our heads and our white plumes up quite that self-destructively high.

Thursday, April 17, 2008 01:29 PM

But is this art?

Is this art or exhibitionism?

In which case, does the student need a gallery or a shrink?

The stress that she has put on her body is appalling.

Thursday, April 17, 2008 01:34 PM
Original article: Quote of the day

Says Who?

>>But the idea that it's not really a factor for most people at all...>>

The one person entitled to pronounce ex cathedra just celebrated Mass in D.C.

I didn't believe him either.

Tom Davidson is playing semantic games before thudding down with his pronunciamento. Why on earth should anyone accept -his- perceptions as being more...well...perceptive than anyone else's?

He came on over with the rest of the pack to protest those perceptions. If he -- and the others -- did that, then, presumably, they see value in attempting to refute those perceptions.

And don't tell me it's because, out of the goodness of their hearts and their rigorous training in logic, they want to set (by-definition) flawed-and-wrong others straight.

They don't sound like Vulcans to me. They sound like chauvinist trolls. I haven't seen this many of the breed since that was called standard operating procedure, back in the 1950s. To me, that indicates they're running angry, defensive, and scared.

Thursday, April 17, 2008 02:04 PM

Hoax?

Ann Landers used to say that Yalies were great hoaxsters.

If this is a hoax, it's a dreadful one.

Saturday, April 19, 2008 09:29 AM

@BabyGrumpus

You've done a -lot- of pronouncements on the nature of academe.

What do you really know about it? To me, it sounds as if your talking about jobs and standards derives not from knowledge of the university system, but from a grudge that you seem to regard as an ideology. There is a difference between ideology and spite that you have missed. But, then, you are well-named. I want to hear how you're not privileged. You're good at slinging the names; let's see you defend yourself if you can.

To another poster from the U.K.: I was fascinated to hear that in the U.K., the specializations are so rigid. I knew that undergraduates specialized very early, as opposed to taking a broad liberal arts curriculum (or technical or business training), but at least in my generation, Oxbridge graduates seemed to have the happy facility to switch in and out of academe, journalism, and business.

No one's surprised to hear me agree with DurianJoe about the nature of a liberal arts education. It -is- possible to make the transition from a pretty arcane field into business; it's just not easy. And, up until the second wave, with the exception of a few outstanding women's colleges, studies -were- men's studies.

Were. amd are. such colleges privileged? Only in the sense that Marine basic training is privileged, I've subsequently come to learn from an LTC who trained some of the first all-female Marine platoons (and I hope I've got the term right; my family's Army). If you survive, you get the accomplishments -and- the respect for your teachers that you've earned.

Most Active Letters Threads

523

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
422

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
186

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
130

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?
103

Polanski moves from jail to ski chalet

The rapist director is granted bail, and one of his most vocal apologists celebrates

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon