Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

dick dworkin

Published Letters: 3325
Editor's Choice: 5

Saturday, January 3, 2009 07:19 PM

yes, Lincoln turned our blessed slave republic into a evil fascist tyranny

wingers just can't help themselves apparently, their lack of awareness almost makes you feel sorry for them. Almost.

Saturday, January 3, 2009 09:50 PM

just like you need checks and balances in the political system you need checks and balances in other areas of life

yes, in general people should buy and sell what they want at the prices the buyer and seller agree to, but because the market is good at rewarding "winners" (successful sellers) what happens is that the winners accumulate enough power to cheat. This is not an abberation this is the inevitable consequence of unregulated markets in an economy more complex than subsistence barter. This is why every society that has ever existed has regulated markets.

Sunday, January 4, 2009 12:13 PM

it's true that the concept of terrorism is elastic but the idea that for fighting to stop both sides have to stop is less so

even though one side may be far stronger than the other (less so does no mean completely inelastic it is true, there can still be dispute about which actions constitute warfare and which do not).

Sunday, January 4, 2009 03:32 PM

Finally you could not close without a (like the global warming types) a declaration that the matter is closed.

So concern about global warming is a conspiracy supported delusion too, just like the failure to understand that as long as the govt. does nothing, ever, to manage the economy everything will always work out for the best. Yeah the world is certainly coming around to your way of thinking alright.

Just purely as a matter of tactics a little helpful advice: when you are attempting to convince people that one particular element of the conservative religion just happens to be based on some sort of rational understanding of reality in spite of all logic and evidence to the contrary it is probably best to stick to one topic at a time. The more different unrelated conservative "truths" that you assert just happen by sheer coincidence to be misunderstood in this way the less credible you appear.

Sunday, January 4, 2009 04:30 PM

the scientific certainty of global warming is much more established than the certainty of historical hypotheticals ever can be

so I am just pointing out that when you dispute something that has already been proven with absolute certainty in the physical sciences, such as the fact that man made global warming is occurring, you needlessly compromise your credibility when attempting to sow confusion about historical events where (unlike the case with the physical sciences such as in the case of global warming) no controlled experiment can ever be done that will with absolute certainty prove you wrong.

Sunday, January 4, 2009 04:35 PM

obviously proving the validity or truth of moral or value judgments is a a different

matter

Monday, January 5, 2009 01:03 PM

re bombs, demographic and otherwise

if Israel can not make real peace i.e no rockets they will never withdraw from the west bank, they will also never allow themselves to become a minority by absorbing the west bank or gaza and giving the residents the vote. So it's permanent occupation until there is real peace.

Monday, January 5, 2009 01:14 PM

Iran will never nuke Israel, they believe in individual and tactical martyrdom, not the total incineration of Shia socieity

which they know is what they would get.

Monday, January 5, 2009 01:22 PM

true but the Israelis will have 50 years longer to design some sort of system which will allow them to live i.e have control even with an Arab majority

they certainly aren't going to speed things up by making it happen in 10 years OR by opening the west bank to hamas rocket bases.

Monday, January 5, 2009 01:28 PM

no Jew has ever lived as a full citizen in an Islamic society

and until TRUE Islamic political AND CULTUAL secularism exists this wouldn't even be theoretically possible.

Monday, January 5, 2009 01:43 PM

it may not really be democratic or they may have to partion the country again in some form i.e create arab "states" within Israel but one thing is ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN:

for the forseeable future no Jew will be able to live like a human being in an Arab or Moslem dominated society and there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that could have been done in the past 50 or 100 years that would have changed that.

Monday, January 5, 2009 01:57 PM

it doesn't matter how many STATES have nuclear weapons, they can never use them against Israel

the only real risk that nuclear weapons pose is that someone who is not, or who believes that they are not, subject to retaliation will acquire one.

Monday, January 5, 2009 02:06 PM

no Jew, or any other non moslem, EVER WAS ANYTHING OTHER THAN A SLAVE in a Moslem dominated society EVER

since the founding is Islam up until this minute. The ONLY PLACE IN THE WORLD when there is even something approaching real citizenship for members of minority religions is in western secular societies.

Monday, January 5, 2009 03:30 PM

the point is that no modern person would voluntarily live under even a "benign" form of

second class citizenship and the difference between what jews under arab rule today would face and the treatment of arabs in israel is obvious to any rational honest person.

Monday, January 5, 2009 03:34 PM

But it is only a matter of time before a non-state entity acquires one, possibly from an aforementioned state

Why? In 50 years of cold war and proxy war between the Soviets and the west the soviets managed to keep their nuclear weapons out of the hands to their non state clients. Other nuclear armed states would have every incentive to do the same.

Monday, January 5, 2009 04:25 PM

I think such women should have their heads examined but it is their choice to do such a foolish thing and I would not interfere with that choice.

That is exactly the point, the equivalent choice shouldn't be imposed on anyone. I agree with you that Israeli jews would be crazy to allow themsleves to be ruled by arabs.

Monday, January 5, 2009 05:45 PM

And given the way they have been treated by the Zionists Palestinians would be crazy to submit to rule by those Zionists

which is exactly why they have to split the territory between them and have two separate states, BUT this will not happen until the Jewish state can live free from attack, however ineffectual.

Monday, January 5, 2009 06:18 PM

They old "Jews control everything" you even managed to sneak banking in there. You sound like Julius Streicher himself

I'm pretty pro Israel but you've got to admit that the disproprtionate prominence and influence of "Likudism" in the US govt. politics and media is a very real phenomenon. It is true that some of this is due to christian fundies but to deny that "AIPAC power" is real and to cry anti semitism at anyone who brings it up only has the effect of providing cover to the real anti semites by suppressing honest discussion.

Monday, January 5, 2009 06:34 PM

I sincerely wish it didn't have to be that way but this outcome has been more or less inevitable ever since 1948.

Well the Arabs could try peace, but if it happens as you say then Israeli jews will do whatever they have to do to survive, which they cannot do as a minority in an arab state, and if that process results in their failure to survive they will take down whoever is the agent of that destruction with their nukes as they go. It would be smart for the arabs to deal.

Monday, January 5, 2009 06:37 PM

there are hardly any Jews anywhere in the world now other than Israel and the US

anyway. Hitler mostly did the job for Europe and the the Moslem world has fully cleared itself.

Monday, January 5, 2009 07:14 PM

the question is what happens when/if a majority of israels citizens/voters are arabs who can then vote away the jewishness of Israel

obviously the system is going to have to be rigged, somehow, so that this doesn't/can't happen.

Monday, January 5, 2009 07:48 PM

the israeli govt would deal, especially if the US forced them too, the issue could have been settled between clinton and arafat

but there has to be someone on the palestinian side who can be relied on to PERMANENTLY FORCE ALL the palestinians to stop fighting. Then there will be peace.

Monday, January 5, 2009 07:52 PM

for the jews to allow themselves to be ruled by arabs would be to consign themselves to either death or slavery

and they will commit suicide first, but NOT quietly.

Monday, January 5, 2009 08:10 PM

Since there is no one that can do that for the Zionists why do you think there could be someone who can do it for the Palestinians

The US can and would be forced to force Israel to deal once it became clear that the Palestinians were prepared to REALLY deal (not make some temporary arrangement from which to continue the fight later). When this happens then there will be peace.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
436

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon