Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 3325
Editor's Choice: 5
and so very few people feel any need or reason to react in any other way. It will be a long time before this changes I think.
The problem with this prescription is that telling it to someone who is biologically on "high" is like telling someone who is starving that the desire to eat shouldn't be the center of their self image.
the fact that not EVERY assertion of gender difference is valid does not mean that there are NO gender differences.
or at least with men who aren't willing to worship them with the unquestioning, total and subservient devotion which they believe their success "competing in a mans world" has earned them and which they falsely believe, or claim to believe, that men get, or have ever gotten, from women.
are about more than just traditionalists using "essentialism" to prop up the patriarchy.
for THEM ONLY it is an objective physical reality beyond the genitals with real social and behavioral implications which aren't entirely under the control of the environment. That it?
whether it is possible to have a biologically female brain trapped in a PHYSICALLY and HORMONALLY normal male body or vice versa, or if this IS possible, how many transgendered people have this specific brain issue and not some other problem.
the issues, in both cases, are what develops, or has developed. As a general matter biologically If you have male hormone levels or female hormone levels at key points in development you have male or female, regardless of what the chromosomes are. NORMALLY the chromosomes control these hormones but not always, and in some species it is normal for the determination of which sex develops to be made by environmental factors (turtles, alligators) and not by which genes the embryo carries, some animals (reef fish) change gender as adults.
and this is leading to fairly hilarious mental pretzels when they try, or sometimes when they don't try, to take the politically correct views of BOTH transgender and homosexuality.
because she isn't a "real" woman?
gender roles and behavior among average heterosexuals.
cecil. You should check it out. Sometimes a different perspective can break through the mental fog created by relentless propagandizing.
Except when they do. If you love someone ENOUGH then NOTHING else matters, right?
OR simple.
that is what a delusion is. It isn't real. People who believe that they are really meant to be amputees don't get doctors to agree to cut their legs off. Sometimes they force the issue by freezing their legs in liquid nitrogen until the doctors are forced to amputate. It may be that the wrong brain in the wrong body is the medical reality. I don't think this is clear for people without other evidence of chromosomal or hormonal abnormality, but it may be. It's absurd though to suggest that the question is beside the point.
how many people who try to get hormones and surgery are turned down on the grounds that they have some other problem than true trnassexualism and is there a consensus among the various doctors and psychologists involved and between various institutions doing this about who they are.
if old men could be GUARANTEED pregnancy free sex with young women you can be sure that the economics of "courtship", as well as the mechanics of its consummation, would be very different than they are (for old men with money).
(and this is even if you assume that the motive to have sex is equal, if you don't assume that the disparity in motivation is even greater) since this is the case it is difficult to see how men and women can ever be equal earners without a system which massively handicaps men.
go into it?
As well they should be, any so called political reform which BROADENS AND DEEPENS the role of the govt in policing personal behavior, which the establishment of any form of theocratic state by definition does, INEVITABLY MUST over the long (and ususally the short) run make the problems worse. The problem is that TOO FEW Muslims can see this, and its good to know that many do get it.
so to characterize it as merely or even primarily a nationalist organization is totally incorrect.
sure don't seem to see it that way.
of course arabs and persians are rivals but so are shia and sunni and even though obviously lebanese shia are arabs and not persians it yet remains a fact that hezbollah is a shia organization bankrolled by persian shia iran for the purposes I've already described. Maybe it isn't only fox news watchers who have trouble with more than two options.
after the 1980 revolution and when it achieved spectacular success in driving the US out of Lebanon by the then new for the area technique of suicide bombing it's status was firmly established.
they are an iranian outpost with local support
until the US got involved.
govts would be under pressure from their publics not to host the military forces of an outlaw regime, if this results in a reduction of the US military presence around the world that would be something.
and everyone else who matters is well on the way, BTW swinick I guess you missed the story where the ability has ALREADY been demonstrated to create sperm cells(obviously containing no Y chromosome) from stem cells of women. Men are biologically obsolete now.
this seems like the sort of substitute you might expect.
this would seem to imply that either they are not doing it, or at the very least they are doing it with a diminished sense of its importance.
they wouldn't lose any power because they won't have any anyway and if the male population gets low enough at some point it would be small enough to be the same size as the small percentage of the female population which is as interested in men as men are in women. i.e they are willing to make sacrifices for sex and not resent it.