Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

kimocrossman

Published Letters: 18

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 07:17 PM

Author speakng in SF Thus 7/24 6pm PST World Affairs Council

http://www.itsyourworld.org/assnfe/ev.asp?SnID=1768888882&ID=2271

The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing

Add to Cart

Export To Outlook

Event Date

* 7/24/2008 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM

Please arrive early for registration

Location

* World Affairs Council Auditorium

Address

* 312 Sutter Street

Second Floor

San Francisco, California 94108

Speaker(s)

Tim Shorrock, Investigative Journalist

Tim Shorrock is an investigative journalist who has devoted a quarter-century of research to the intersection of national security and business, specifically researching intelligence contracting for the past four years. His work has appeared in many publications in the United States and abroad, including The Nation, Salon, Mother Jones, Harper’s, Inter Press Service, The Los Angeles Times, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Progressive, The Journal of Commerce, Foreign Policy in Focus and Asia Times. He also appears frequently on the radio as a commentator on US-Korean relations and US intelligence and foreign policy, and has been interviewed on Pacifica’s “Democracy Now,” Air America and CBS Radio. Tim Shorrock grew up in Japan and South Korea.

Event Details

Outsourcing has become par for the course in business and increasingly in government intelligence gathering as well. In recent years, intelligence contracting has grown into a multi-billion dollar industry, with privatization often blurring the lines between public and private sectors. Examples of private contractors can be found in places like Abu Ghraib, and in American intelligence centers throughout the world. Similarly, former high-ranking national security officials can be found in various consulting roles throughout the private sector intelligence industry. Yet, the size, scope, and influence of this intelligence outsourcing has been largely unexamined, and sometimes at odds with congressional oversight and public accountability. Join the Council for a conversation with investigative journalist Tim Shorrock as he discusses this topic in depth in his new book, Spies for Hire.

Advanced registration is recommended for guaranteed seating. However, pre-registration is not required and walk-ins on the day of this program are welcome.

Online Registration

To begin the registration process please select one of the following fees.

Description Amount

Member

Free Register

fee ends 7/24/2008

Non-member

$15.00 Register

fee ends 7/24/2008

Student with valid ID

$5.00 Register

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 05:30 PM

Author to be radio intereviewed Thus 7/24 11AM-Noon PST online streaming

Thursday 7/24 11AM-Noon PST

A conversation with Tim Shorrock, author of Spies for Hire: Inside the Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing and as it happens - just released Salon expose on “Main Core”–

Call-in questions or email your questions in advance!

KALW San Francisco 91.7

Listen online live or archive later that day on-demand

http://www.yourcallradio.org/

Monday, July 21, 2008 11:46 AM

(Free Expression) Mccain OpEd to NYTimes rejected

Suddenly McCain cares about getting the word out (when it's his).

A dust up on Drudge about NyTimes reject draft McCain OpEd

http://drudgereport.com/flashnym.htm

NYT REJECTS MCCAIN'S EDITORIAL; SHOULD 'MIRROR' OBAMA

Mon Jul 21 2008 12:00:25 ET

An editorial written by Republican presidential hopeful McCain has been rejected by the NEW YORK TIMES -- less than a week after the paper published an essay written by Obama, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The paper's decision to refuse McCain's direct rebuttal to Obama's 'My Plan for Iraq' has ignited explosive charges of media bias in top Republican circles.

'It would be terrific to have an article from Senator McCain that mirrors Senator Obama's piece,' NYT Op-Ed editor David Shipley explained in an email late Friday to McCain's staff. 'I'm not going to be able to accept this piece as currently written.'

Thursday, July 17, 2008 02:56 PM

Bush - Domestic AUMF?

@Greenlabormike

My point is that I wonder if this is Legislative Intent which *does* modify legal interpretation.

And I believe Amicus parties missed it because the OpEd was about Warentless Spying.

"And making this argument implicitly suggests that the President could detain civilians in a military prison if he caught them elsewhere. In international waters, for example. "

Only if they were associated with 9/11.

Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:32 PM

Pres was not given Domestic AUMF powers only Foreign & and only for 9/11 issues

@greenlabormike

Please read whole Washington Post OpEd I referred to - Daschle said AUMF explicitly did not include US only foreign and only for 9/11 related

“Literally minutes before the Senate cast its vote, the administration sought to add the words ‘in the United States and’ after ‘appropriate force’ in the agreed-upon text. This last-minute change would have given the president broad authority to exercise expansive powers not just overseas—where we all understood he wanted authority to act—but right here in the United States, potentially against American citizens. I could see no justification for Congress to accede to this extraordinary request for additional authority. I refused.”"

http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=civilliberties_180#civilliberties_180

Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:28 AM

Pres was not given Domestic AUMF powers only Foreign

How can Pres declare US Citizens as US Enemy Combatants? - he does not have Domestic authorities under AUMF Limited War on foreign 9/11 terrorists only

http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=civilliberties_180#civilliberties_180

"Daschle will also write that the White House attempted to add draft language to the AUMF resolution that would give the administration new and sweeping authority to use force to “deter and pre-empt any future acts of terrorism or aggression against the United States,” even against nations and organizations not responsible for the 9/11 attacks." &

“Literally minutes before the Senate cast its vote, the administration sought to add the words ‘in the United States and’ after ‘appropriate force’ in the agreed-upon text. This last-minute change would have given the president broad authority to exercise expansive powers not just overseas—where we all understood he wanted authority to act—but right here in the United States, potentially against American citizens. I could see no justification for Congress to accede to this extraordinary request for additional authority. I refused.”"

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon