Letters to the Editor

• Salon's hypocritical stand on body image

  [Read the article: Fashion faux pas]
  [Read more letters about this article: Here]

  I agree that Atoosa Rubenstein's comments contribute to a culture of self-loathing that many girls must confront and overcome. I say this as an "ugly duckling" myself who has grappled with these issues, and I certainly do not take them lightly. However, Rebecca Traister's vitriolic attack on Ms. Rubenstein smacks of hypocrisy: not even a year ago, Salon published an article by Kate Hahn (http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2005/06/24/gut/index.html) in which Ms. Hahn admits to the exact same sentiments as Ms. Rubenstein. I don't recall Ms. Traister blasting her home publication last June when that article ran. Do Salon's editors feel that mean-spirited attacks like Ms. Traister's are fine, as long as the critical lens doesn't turn inward? Or do they simply assume that their readers won't have long enough memories to spot the contradiction? As for Ms. Traister, has she only recently developed these passionate views about potential damage to girls' self-esteem, or did she just not want to bite the hand that feeds her when her bosses ran Ms. Hahn's article nine months ago?

  Permalink Wednesday, February 8, 2006 05:59 PM

• Re: It's spelled "sight"

  [Read the article: The end of the affair]
  [Read more letters about this article: Here]

  Thank you, mchaput! I honestly would think among these 36 posts, most of which either laud or lambaste Traister's writing ability, someone would have commented on that a little faster. I thought it was only fair to read to the end of all the posts before piling on, and I couldn't believe I had to get to post 36 of 36 to see someone mention that error.

  Permalink Saturday, April 14, 2007 03:50 PM