Letters to the Editor
bucky1
Published Letters: 1714
-
The sky will darken ...
[Read the article: Mike Allen, consummate Beltway "journalist"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]... with winged swine the day LWM stops shouting insults and makes any sense. He is the very cariture of the Democratic lefty that the Republicans use to scare normal people. He may be a Republican troll out to make you folks look bad.
The little fellow even claimed Pon Paul was never right unless it was like a stopped watch.
But Solon wrote on almost the same day as LWM;
"... But Paul stuck to his guns as the debate turned to Iraq. Before the invasion, he raised questions about evidence that Saddam Hussein harbored weapons of mass destruction. He publicly mocked the idea of creating a functioning democracy in Iraq. He rejected the principle of preemptive war. He also opposed the Patriot Act. He attacked the Bush administration for abandoning habeas corpus, authorizing harsh interrogation and permitting warrantless wiretaps. He opposed federalizing Transportation Security Administration workers to guard air travel. He was blunt, forceful and not always politically sensitive. ..."
So, LWM is for the war, the horrible Patriot Act, against habeas corpus, loves torture, love spying on US citizens, and is a big TSA supporter.
Even more sad, LWM still thinks Saddam had WMD.
There you have it. Is he your kind of Democrat?
-
LWM
[Read the article: Mike Allen, consummate Beltway "journalist"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The Little Wanker Man (LWM) has now taken to bringing comments from the past thread in to take out of context and make up cute little replies to what was never written.
Odd, did you folks not know he was a little deranged shit before? Apparently he hates Ron Paul and any supporter of his so much that he can sink to any level to insult and slime. Is he trying to prove that gasbag Limbaugh correct about "lefties"?
I do think all this name calling is not good for GG or Salon. Paul, do you agree with your buddy that name calling is the way to go, because I'll give it to you if you think it makes the comment section more enjoyable. Comment, Paul?
Do you also agree that the two of you should make me the point of this comment section? If so, I'll return the favor.
-
@kovie
[Read the article: Mike Allen, consummate Beltway "journalist"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]kovie --> ...given how incredibly rudely and offensively you've treated some of this blog's longtime and most respected commenters.
I see. They may say anything slimy to me and you can not see it. But, you can see it when I reply in kind. I respond in the same manner that I get treated.
If you would like to join in, you may. It is always more fun to hurl insults at others with toadies in the background egging one on, eh?
Are you a MSM "journalist" that Glenn writes about? That sort of unfairness seems to bug him.
kovie --> ...But I have to say that I found it curious that in the comment above in which you discussed the important role that the INVESTIGATIVE hearing stage of the senate's investigation into Watergate played in bringing to light the many crimes of the Nixon administration and in doing so creating a groundswell of support for impeachment, without which it could never have reached the actual impeachment stage (which of course began in the house, not senate, as per the constitution), you then go on to contradict yourself and assert that, before they've even completed the INVESTIGATIVE hearing stage of investigation BushCo's many crimes, they should skip this stage and just right ahead to the impeachment stage.
Huh?
I did a double "Huh" when I read your words. Where you you get this stuff?
The Democrats have "taken off the table" the idea of impeachment. You read that in the news, right?
I loved the Watergate saga for all of its aspects --- including the investigation phase. The Dems did not "take it off the table" then. But, they had more guts then by the looks of it.
-
Frankly, my dear, ...
[Read the article: Mike Allen, consummate Beltway "journalist"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Please do not leave out Paul, he is part of the tag team. I have told both that I will reply in the same manner as they post to me. In fact, most every post of mine is a reply to someone else who wrote to me. I do not have the nature to let these slimy insults pass. (perhaps the Scots-Irish in me)
However, I promise to be as polite as the slime team allows. No apology needed --- they just need to stop the insults.
I will not ignore the insults just so they "honored regulars" get to write any bestial thing they want to and insult others without retort --- that has been the problem all along.
I am betting that LWM can not stop. Time will tell.
Try to enjoy the rest of your Sunday morning.
-
LWM, yet again
[Read the article: Mike Allen, consummate Beltway "journalist"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]LWM dream this up: " Your fixation on the relationship between arms and tyranny is a bit extreme, as your comments clearly indicate. You hold these opinions because of the right wing crap you read. ...
Your problem is that in your pathetic need to attack you misread every situation, and then make stuff up if you do not have enough.
I have not written on my position on guns to this comment section of Glenn's since he moved here to Salon. And, since I have to register a name over here --- my comments on same on Glenn's blog are unknown to you. and you would never ask for clarification, eh?
So, how then to explain you can fathom all my thoughts on a very controversial subject from an off hand comment on another thread when I was asked if my neighbor should have a nuke.
I guess your deep need to hate. Was I correct?