And, Camille, what did you expect?

Hasn't your high opinion of Obama been based on shallow superficiality, a keen sense of style, and not much else?

Can it be time to revisit the primary, underlying problem? Style be damned. What is the substance of the 'progressive' world view? Could it be that there is no real substance there? Isn't it all about feeling? Isn't it all about feeling hip and cool and righteous?

Hello?

Where is the beef, Camille? Can it be that the kind of European, multi cultural, cradle to grave easy living is bull shit? Isn't this rubbish a complete fairy tale?

Why nitpick about the bow and The Queen and the shabby gift, when, hello girl, there are much bigger things to worry about?

We now have a Presidency and both houses of Congress run by demagogues who somehow believe in a fairy tale. They say they care about the children while evicting close to 2000 poor kids from their private schools in Washington, D.C. They kowtow to corrupt unions who fund their privileged lives.

In the meantime a worrisome majority falls for this bullshit fairy tale, while their "leaders" dream up 'solutions' which redistribute wealth we do not have. They seek to force union goons on every Walmart and McDonalds.

Never mind all of this rubbish can only intensify the economic downturn, and, if it is not reversed, it will lead us all down into another great depression and the inevitable tyrannies which accompany shortages and hunger.

Why not try delving a little bit deeper, Camille? How about thousands of kids loosing their school vouchers, their only probable shot at escaping from a cycle of ignorance and poverty?

How can we redistribute wealth we do not have?

Is the so called liberal world view deaf, dumb and blind when it collides with reality?

What are the dynamics of growth and progress and prosperity?

Can the government guarantee our well being, or will the government, drunk with power and conceit, destroy everything we know of any real value?

The one quality which all 'progressives' share is their rage.

This here saloon, stalin.com, is all about angry, raging leftoids yelling and screaming and ranting and insulting Bush, Cheney, Reagan, Rove, Rumsfeld and anybody else who has dared to disagree with their rabid leftoid views.

They would gladly roast you in your home. If Obaba is successful at turning this recession into another great depression they will blame you. They would gladly give you a fair, ten minute trial, and take you to a wall where they would shoot you.

You see humor, irony, critical thought and independence of mind is not allowed. If you disagree, you will be scorned and branded.

What is it that makes them all so fucking angry?

That's a very good question.

Maybe it's because their wonderful utopias never work. They all end in factions and slavery and shortages and people taking advantage of each other, and lying and murdering for power and money.

Still, they keep trying to redistribute wealth they do not have, and, anyone who disagrees with all this rubbish is an enemy of the people.

Liberals are more sophisticated, they are more COMPLICATED.

Gosh, I nebber would have knowed it.

So, the world is actually not some simple mechanistic thing, easily 'splained to the unwashed who dare to agree with simple minded radio talk show hosts like Laura Ingraham, Michael Savage and Mark Steyn.

And conservative thinkers like Charles Krauthammer are simple minded fools who never think for themselves.

And, liberals are so well read. Never mind they refuse to read anything by Milton Friedman, Gary Becker, Richard Epstein, Friedrich von Hayek, Those guys are just simple minded fools as well, right?

It really takes a very complicated and sophisticated mind to figure out how we can redistribute wealth we do not have. It is so sophisticated to not see all the corruption and waste and damage big governments have done.

How do they do this? Is it all that white wine and cheese?

Thanks for the lesson, a very good lesson in self regard, a very good lesson in libral conceit, my frem. You just keep drinking that Barbara Boxer, Barney Frank, Hairy Reid Kool Aid.

The truth, you can't take the truth!

Camille is a money maker for stalin.com. She gets more hits and comments than anybody. She's the Rush of this here saloon, the baddest cowboy-girl in the place, and Maristow wants to silence her.

You don't hear her whining about people trying to silence her the way Glennn Greenwald is always whining about people trying to silence him, do you?

Cyborg! Dude! I don't know about 'breitbart.' You should check out "Commentary's" 'Contentions' site. Most of what is written there is pithy, 100 words or less, and much of it is very humorous, witty and intelligent. Yes, Jennifer Rubin takes names and kicks ass, but, you know, that's what she's paid to do. Us humble posters, are just that, humble posters who usually show everbody a lot of respect.

Maybe you, sir, could 'splain how we can redistribute wealth we do not have. I'm very interested in finding out how this would work. There must be some good reasons it will work fine now, even though it has only resulted in horrible tyrannies in the past. Have you librals evolved so much that, now, this time, there will be no forced seizures, no show trials, no gulags, no reeducation camps, no firing squads?

Don't you find it troublesome and odd that Maristow doesn't want stalin.com to publish Camille anymore? And when people like Mary Stowe start ranting about Bush and all that, and start insulting people who disagree with them as if they were come kind of evil sub humans, aren't we back on the road to totalitarian nightmares, totalitarian LIVING nightmares.