They could smear Paul Wolfowitz, and help drive him out of the utterly corrupt World Bank, which he was trying to clean up, trying to make alla dose overpaid bureaucrats actually take responsibility for all the "loans" (free money) ending up in the hands of corrupt government elites.

Why did they smear him? Well, this unmarried guy had the temerity to have a girlfriend who worked at the World Bank. This American Jew was enjoying a real loving relationship with an Egyptian woman who did not work directly for him. The NYT helped to hound him out of there, and not a peep from stalin.com.

And, when Clinton was revealed to not be having real affairs of the heart, but the kind of abusive sexual demands we passed so many laws to prevent, we also heard not a peep from Glen Greenberg and the NYT, who defended Bubba to the max. So, Glen and all you good libral-pwogwessive twits found no problem with Billy Clinton's predatory behavior toward women, but Paul Wolfowitz had to go, right?

Yup, dat's right, my frems!

And why did Paul W bodder you guyz so?

Well, he is one of them there ebil neocons, that's what he is.

He does not sing from the pee cee hymnal. No kumbaya for him, just hard headed facts and demands for accountability and actual results that work.

Now the NYT is trying to do the same kind of smear job on Vaclav Klaus, the Czech President, and, again, not a peep from Gelding Glenn or Phony Joanie. Well, Klaus thinks much of this manmade global warming stuff is a sham, and dat puts a target over his heart in libral circles.

----------------

Also, embedded in this rubbish about unlearned lessons, thee's the utter kluelessness and denial of the libral-pwogwessive mind when it comes to dealing effectively with the terrorist scum who feel so entitled to indiscriminately murder innocent civilians.

Don't you remember the lovely of Danny Pearl who was forced to say "I am a Jew," and his screams of agony, just as his head was being chopped from his torso?

Why can't you people grow up, for crying out loud?

This is the real reason why "liberal" has become a dirty word among so many voters. You guys are utter Ostriches when it comes to how to effectively counter criminals, thugs, bullies, rogue states and terrorist networks.

You are utterly KLUELESS,

You know it too, but how to square your gooey libral philosophy with the hard headed truths of power, consequences, merit and responsibility?

Why do libral-pwogwessives get so upset when you ask them to view the beheading of Daniel Pearl or the jumpers of 9/11?

Is it because it is a vivid, real life horror show, which shows what happens to innocent idealists in a real world where so many feel entitled to not just kill you, they want to humiliate you and your society first, and then they murder you?

Remember about 7 years ago, the 2 unarmed Israeli reservists who wondered into the wrong neighborhood, and were murdered, and the film of one of their murderers preening befire the TV cameras in an open second story window, showing off the Jewish blood on his hands and waving a rag soaked in the dead Jews' blood?

Gopi is a perfect example of all a you librals, utterly dumbfounded by the existence of evil, and utterly klueless about how to confront evil.

There are very clear examples of evil. This upsets liberals very much because their nostrums require all of the human race to be made up of good guys.

Sorry: Although nobody is utterly good or bad, this is no excuse to be mostly good or mostly bad. We all have choices to make, and anyone who plans or sponsors what happened in Mumbai or Lower Manhatten deserves to be hunted down and destroyed wherever he may be.

You are like Diogenes with his lantern, looking for an honest man around here.

Lot's of luck, my frem!

What you find here are smug, arrogant, self-referential partisans including the what happened to my balls Glen to the phony Joanie and their chorus of true believers.

They fancy themselves pure as the driven snow on the mountain tops of Aspen, but, in reality, they cannot deal with the institutions which really require CHANGE, especially our failed system of public education.

They view this as a Republican issue, as if alla dem meanspirited Wepubwickans are just using the absolute failure of the public schools from Atlanta to San Diego to work their nasty right wing agenda.

Why can't Obama confront and CHANGE this horrible mess?

Why shouldn't he?

This is his chance to do something transformative which only he can do.

Why not?

They foam at the mouth, don't they.

Glen, the what happened to my balls? wanna be a pundit, and phony Joanie can at least write.

I know, what they write ignores a lot of reality, and is mostly vain flights of self absorbed fancy. Especially Glen, what happened to my balls? is a pretty good writer. Good choice of words and a fairly good flow from one thing to another, but, when you shine a light on it, it turns out to be pure partisan rubbish over and over again.

And. Joanie. She's just a mean old female cat nagging away. She's angry. Who knows why?

He's angry.

Who knows why?

Maybe they are just angry elitists who will always be angry because they've been passed over in the great game of life.

Who knows?