Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

beigelights

Published Letters: 77     Editor's Choice: 2

  • Not a good time to discuss what's important to you

    [Read the article: Exploiting women to protect animals?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    If I was disrespectful and rude, I would say that since someone is being raped every two minutes http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/frequency-of-sexual-assault

    baby seals really should not be a priority right now.

    However, I think everyone should talk about and work for what they believe in at any given time.

  • Stripping is empowering

    [Read the article: Exploiting women to protect animals?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    The time I spent in the sex industry was one of the unhealthy-est times of my life, and the proportion of women I met in the sex industry was about 3-1 mentally ill, abuse survivors, and drug users to healthy empowered women. I guess one woman's exploitation is another womans empowerment. Personally, I think doing something women haven't already done for thousands of years, like physics, is a lot more revolutionary than selling sex.

  • PETA is doing what it has to do

    [Read the article: Exploiting women to protect animals?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    PETA's net assets according to it's most recent 990, found here: http://www.guidestar.org/index.jsp

    are $15 million. The Humane Society's are $200 million. So apparently PETA's headline-grabbing-at-all-costs tactics aren't that effective. Even given the difference in animal-rights missions between the two, that asset gap is HUGE.

  • Who's

    [Read the article: Exploiting women to protect animals?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    trying to "ban discussion of/reference to the matter" of women's pubic hair?!?!? The objection is that PETA called women's naturally occurring body hair "disgusting." Funny, I bet a lot of the waxes and creams used to remove that hair are tested on animals. . .

  • Are you going to start NOT being bothered by animal suffering because PETA offends you?

    [Read the article: Exploiting women to protect animals?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    The reason this animal lover supports the Humane Society and not PETA is because of their offensive ad campaigns. I suspect that offending people like me who would otherwise support them is at least part of the reason PETA doesn't have $200 million in the bank like the HS does. But hey, they've got the $20's those vegan strip club guys didn't spend at the bar. . .

  • Thanks for the tip

    [Read the article: Exploiting women to protect animals?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    DurianJoe. I just wrote to my reps about the downed animal bill: http://www.farmsanctuary.org/get_involved/update_downed_animals08.html

    I might even give Farm Sanctuary a donation. I love organizations that don't make me feel objectified to get their point across.

    I think the problem is that PETA has consistently and deliberately used questionable tactics, and resorted to personal attacks against those who brought it to their attention. I think their antics actually harm their cause and cheapen the publics view of the problems they are supposed to be working against.

  • Did you know Gloria Steinem married an animal rights activist?!?!?!?

    [Read the article: Exploiting women to protect animals?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I JUST found this out:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bale

    Gloria, feminist icon, married David Bale, animal rights activist. You see, we can live in peace!

  • Possible analogy

    [Read the article: Meghan McCain is, like, totally a genius]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I felt like the female characters in Michael Clayton mirrored this dichotomy - the country bumpkin who is willing to secretly fly to NY to meet a lunatic who chased her through a parking lot naked is a sympathetic character but the intelligent (albeit ruthless) attorney for uNorth is pure evil.

  • The article actually said:

    [Read the article: Meghan McCain is, like, totally a genius]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    " The reporter, Libby Copeland, seems to want McCain to come off as a bimbo. . . Similar logic has governed media portrayals of Paris Hilton and Jessica Simpson. Half-baked assertions that these women are merely "acting" like sexified dimwits."

    In otherwords, Charly here was critiquing the media's portrayal of McCain as a bimbo. And it is noteworthy that the Republican party, for which McCain is blogging, campaigns on anti-intellectualism and women-as-fluffy-bunnies-not-human-beings.

    To Libertyson, I am a young woman, and a Hillary supporter, and I have never said something like Obama has an "overwhelming need to beat people over the head with his intelligence." Maybe it's immature women rather than young women who feel defensive upon reading this article.

  • "Hilary's campaign amounts to nothing more than a bitter, messianic, ego trip"

    [Read the article: Meghan McCain is, like, totally a genius]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    this [comment] comes off as a major slam of [Hillary Clinton]. Perhaps she doesn't come from the same mold as [Obama] (the seemingly perfect [canidate]), but why does she have to? You betray some ugly prejudices ("[bitter]", "[messianic]") in what is ostensibly a [broadsheet article] critique. Why not just drop the pretense and change the title of the piece to "[Hillary Clinton] pissess me off"?

  • You make a good point

    [Read the article: Meghan McCain is, like, totally a genius]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    DTerry. Despite calling it's audience stupid, however, I think the piece made some good points about the portrayal of McCain. And I should clarify that the Republican party promotes docility in the massess of women, not the figurehead battleaxes who are its mouthpieces.

    I certainly don't think everyone is defensive if they don't agree with the piece. But accusing the author of attacking young women who like lipgloss and then insulting Clinton supporters sounds childish and defensive to me.

  • Fess up, Linney

    [Read the article: Meghan McCain is, like, totally a genius]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    You're really Ann Coulter posting under a pseudonym, aren't you? LOL

    The volume and quality of your comments really makes me respect the openmindedness of the comment moderators on Broadsheet!

  • Apologies

    [Read the article: Meghan McCain is, like, totally a genius]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Libertyson - I'm sorry I insinuated that you were immature.

    Mattcable - I'm sorry I aped your comment.

    Linney - I'm sorry I called you Ann Coulter.

  • So. . .

    [Read the article: "Petroleum perpetuates patriarchy"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    1. Participation of women in the work force has been linked to greater political, social and economic power by researchers.

    AND

    2. Women have been prostitutes and strippers in Saudi Arabia and other places where women have very little power for thousands of years

    So, apparently all that work in the sex industry doesn't result in greater status for women the way participation in typically male fields does. I guess the sex work is empowering, just not, you know, politically, economically or socially. . .

  • Oh, Dick

    [Read the article: "Petroleum perpetuates patriarchy"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I'm sure you would like more detail! I think they were probably called dancing girls or just members of a harem back in the day.

  • You make a good point

    [Read the article: "Petroleum perpetuates patriarchy"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Rupert - what I took away from the article is that if I want to help out sisters overseas, helping to invest in economic opportunities for them in non-extraction industries is the way to go. Then women in other countries will have the power to create their own liberation movements.

  • @Canuckistan Bob

    [Read the article: Breaking the mirrored ceiling]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I have read a few of your comments and I think you're hot (intellectually).

    Also:

    Feminism = equality of the sexes.

    Strip clubs = one sex doing all the work, the other sex determining the standard of 'sexiness', i.e. not equality (Barring very few exceptions)

    Hence, strip clubs = not feminist.

    Strippers, you can be as feminist as you want, but your industry is not.

Most Active Stories

Read More

Letters Help

Daily Delivery

Salon headlines in your mailbox