Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

ikuiku

Published Letters: 756
Editor's Choice: 26

Thursday, October 8, 2009 08:38 AM

While I think this effort by these idiots is very entertaining . . .

. . . and highlights the poverty of their supposed faith ("We know better than Jesus!"), this is nothing new.

I don't have time to read the entirety of articles like this to see if this has been brought up, but the Bible, particularly the New Testament, has been rewritten about five times in the last 1800 years or so. The Vatican has locked away the New Testament as it was compiled in the first 100 years after Christ's time (if ever existed). And remember, he never wrote anything. The whole religion is based on texts conceived at arms length by multiple authors - the Rashomon scriptures.

Thursday, October 8, 2009 11:00 AM

Good point, inshushinak , but . . .

. . . too many Islamists and, apparently, most of the students in madras outside of the Arab world are "learning" the Koran in Arabic, though many students may only be marginally literate in their native tongues. The instance of understanding the Koran in Arabic is about the same as "the Church" insisting on Latin for so many centuries, even though historically most of the people who used the language in the "lands of the Bible" were the Romans and their collaborators.

It's all crap anyway, but I just thought I'd point that out.

First off, I start any conversation with religious folks -- the ones that show up at my door every few days, for example -- to come back when they can actually read their texts in original languages and not just English. (This is a place, btw, where Islam is more sophisticated -- while the Koran is still a composite, edited text, it's preserved its contemporaneous language well and the faithful are expected to learn and read the original language; translations 'don't cont'). . . -- inshushinak

Thursday, October 8, 2009 11:54 AM

Oh, it's worse than that.

See today's Financial Times. Edward Luce, England's own neo-con, and one of the few truly conservative columnists for an otherwise sensible paper, has an article trumpeting Michelle Bachmann as a rising star in American politics. What horse shit.

Luce's cover article is about the dollar as well, thus the Bachmann connection as she is such an expert on currency.

Sired by a Tory politician, Luce has more in common politically with Henry Luce than he does to latter day British conservatives.

Monday, October 12, 2009 12:42 PM

Meaning?

When he talks like this, Rush makes *serious* conservative writers and commentators like Ross Douthat (NYTimes--I'm picking on him because his column today is equal to anything Bill Kristol writes) . . . -- Lucy with Diamonds

So is it that Douthat is as "good" a writer as Kristol or just as much an asshat as Kristol?

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 08:44 AM

Most American corporations pay an effective tax rate below 20%.

Quite true Mr. Leonard so perhaps someone might realize that the opposite could also be true: if the tax burden on our shores was lessened then jobs might be created here. . . .-- savoy-miami

It wouldn't matter if the government actually gave American corporations money, which, of course, it does in the form of farm subsidies, R&D subsidies, and pretty much all defense contracting. American corporation no longer wish to pay a living wage. They won't create jobs here when they can manufacture most consumer goods (70% of our economy now) abroad for pennies an hour.

American corporations should all pay at least 30% and personal income tax needs to be raised on income above $500K a year by at least 10%. Then we need to go to a 60% rate for all income above $5mil a year.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 08:35 AM

Well, this is probably a sure sign that Lord Karth ain't getting any.

. . . and any over-40 man who thinks about sex in the present tense at all---is probably in need of competent psychiatric treatment.-- Lord Karth

What happen, did it fall off or is the wife really ugly and/or frigid?

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 08:54 AM

It may be their best serious movie because it has the strongest cast.

Salon readers = better than insiders? Miller's Crossing

But called out and beloved by many Salon readers' posts.

But from the shot of the hat blowing across leaves on Miller's Crossing was a shiver up the spine film experience I get maybe twice a decade. -- neumann103

Agreed. I haven't seen No Country For Old Men, but as others pointed out, it's not entirely their movie since it was taken from other source material.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:14 AM

Tempest in a teapot?

After all, this is about a soft drink company (unimportant) and their use of Twitter (doubly unimportant).

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:18 PM

How would you know? You work out at the same club?

As I've asked before, how do you keep your job?

Looks like original equipment to me.

http://www.weddingstand.com/articles/Betty%20Draper%203%20mad%20men.jpg

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 01:29 PM

It doesn't really matter what you think you were saying, because . . .

. . . you are perhaps the least talented writer at Salon and never saw a deep end you didn't want to plunge into whether there was water there or not.

Also, juuust to clarify, I was neither suggesting that Jones actually got a boob job nor that she was "forced into that jacket." -- Tracy C-F

I only write this as a concerned reader because, as we all know, Salon had to make some editorial staff reductions recently and how you made the grade remains a mystery to many regular readers.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 01:37 PM
Original article: Dow 10000!

The Dow Jones is no more a meaningful indicator . . .

. . . of how the whole economy is doing than is the price of soy beans. Most trading is done by program or by people who couldn't tell you the first thing about economics or business done so on behalf of "customers" (marks if the truth be told) who also couldn't tell you the first thing about economics or business.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 02:19 PM
Original article: Why the Berlin Wall fell

Are Salon and Kotkin's publishers the only ones who didn't know this?

Reagan, as the idiots on the right want us to believe, did not bring down the Soviet Union - the Soviet Union did itself in. Ditto with Poland and the rest of the Eastern bloc. The whole muggilla collapsed of it's own bad weight. This was pretty much the conclusion reached by all the political scientists I remember reading more than a decade ago when in graduate school. Do they call Kotkin Rip Van Winkle behind his back at faculty functions?

North Korea would have been reunited with South Korea a decade ago as well if it weren't for the fucking Chinese.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
412

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
407

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
328

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon