Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

ikuiku

Published Letters: 756
Editor's Choice: 26

Thursday, May 14, 2009 01:47 PM

I kind of doubt that Blackwater has the personnel for this kind of thing.

They're mostly cowboys. Even torturing takes a bit of finesse, something the former mall cops and special forces wannabes that make up the majority of Blackwater's "staff" probably have in short supply.

They weren't Blackwater. There were smaller, spookier operations -- ex-CIA people rehired by the agency to supply them with deniability.

The CIA's torture psychologists were a tiny shop in Seattle, just those two Mormon PhDs and maybe some support staff.

Where did you get this information?

The CIA's rendition flight planning services were supplied by Jeppesen Dataplan, a Boeing subsidiary. -- teho

This group flies planes. I doubt it has anything to do with this otherwise.

What is most disturbing is a report that came out back in 2004 (I think on Juan Cole's site) that some of the interrogators in Iraq were Mossad. God help us if this was the case and it is proven publicly.

Friday, May 15, 2009 08:56 AM
Original article: "Angels & Demons"

Tom Hanks has had a charmed career.

He seems to remain popular in spite of wildly uneven work. For every Philadelphia, Saving Private Ryan and Apollo 13, his contracts apparently stipulates that he must make a Sleepless in Seattle, a Forrest Gump and two movies from shitty Dan Brown novels.

Friday, May 15, 2009 09:57 AM
Original article: "Angels & Demons"

Wow! Bill B., you're the perfect audience for this kind of shit.

So you think there's some sort of religious or psychological subtext to hating bad books, which almost always make worse movies?

I just have to say that people hate these books and movies so much that I detect a little emotional and religious baggage going on here. What does Brown's horrible prose have to do with whether or not this is a good movie? . . . No, I think a lot of the disdain people feel for Brown has to do with his messing with their programming. -- Bill B

Raised a Lutheran, I'm an atheist with a BA in literature. So my disdain for this kind of thing rises not from a knee-jerk defense of Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. No, I hate these books and movies because their popularity is symptomatic of our knuckle-dragging culture. At least Jacqueline Susanne had good fuck scenes.

Friday, May 15, 2009 12:07 PM
Original article: "Angels & Demons"

C'mon Bill B., just admit . . .

. . . you're a big fan of Dan Brown. That's better than hiding behind nonsense about how his books make Catholics uncomfortable (many of whom think the church's hierarchy is its biggest problem today) or the ridiculous notion that reading a Dan Brown novel is somehow a greater intellectual undertaking than watching "Dancing With The Stars" or "Survivor."

I think the way you end your sentence has as much to do with the state of our culture as does bad fiction. And personally, if Brown's formula gets hundreds of thousands reading a book and visualizing instead of passively sitting in front of the TV, I don't think that's a bad thing. -- Bill B

Friday, May 15, 2009 01:25 PM
Original article: "Angels & Demons"

A better questions is . . .

. . . why did Jackson leave the "Cleansing of the Shire" out of LOTR? That chapter really was the epic's conclusion with the last few pages really an epilogue.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 08:37 AM
Original article: The day the bloggers won

Won what?

The new and "improved" bill concerning electronic surveillance contains none of the latter. Blogs still matter very little and most Americans get what little news they consume from television and, in declining numbers, newspapers. Dyed-in-the-wool Liberals and conservatives read blogs, the general public does not.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009 11:21 AM
Original article: Sexual chocolate

It's not chocolate, . . .

. . . it's a Mars product. Probably contains less than 10% cocoa. So, yes, it is probably a tough sell compared to real chocolate.

You wouldn't think selling chocolate to women would be that hard, . . .

Wednesday, May 20, 2009 08:38 AM
Original article: Electric cars are coming!

To make this transition meaningful . . .

. . . we need something akin to a gun buy back program to get older, less fuel efficient cars and trucks off the road. Make it need based, and then enact a federal tax on engine displacement and curb weight to "encourage" the rich and/or stupid to "retire" their gas hogs. Legitimate business exceptions/allowances would need to be considered (farmers, contractors, landscapers, etc.).

I agree with other writers, however, that we still need to spend a king's ransom on light rail and intercity rail. No one should ever have to drive anywhere in a city or even to get the the next one up the line.

Thursday, May 28, 2009 02:03 PM

Actually, I think Pelosi . . .

. . . is a threat to the whole Democratic Party. With leaders like her . . .

Monday, June 1, 2009 09:24 AM

I'm not sure why they would . . .

. . . be getting rid of the Pontiac line entirely. Three of the best vehicles GM makes right now are Pontiacs. Saturns were always a joke and Hummer's are just plain stupid. Hopefully, some enterprising nationalists in Sweden will buy the Saab line and return it to its former glory, with a plug-in hybrid engine, of course.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009 11:24 AM

I'm not sure this matters much.

Since many radio markets switch tracking/polling methods, Limbaugh's ratings have fallen across the country. I believe he's just talking himself into a smaller and smaller corner.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009 04:09 PM

Palm oil production . . .

. . . is no more an environmentally positive thing in SE Asia than growing corn for ethanol is in the U.S. In fact, it's probably worse as a lot of the acreage brought under cultivation for palm oil was once forested land.

Unlike temperate forests, it's not really possible to recreate tropical forests. Once they are gone, they can't be remade. At least not in our lifetime.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009 03:21 PM

Is Obama blowing his chance to rein in Wall Street?

Yes. Meaningful health care reform is probably doomed as well.

Thursday, June 11, 2009 04:50 PM

I know for a fact that very few people working for BofA . . .

. . . have the slightest idea as to why Lewis wanted Merrill. The company wasn't worth anything even before the true depth of it's indebtedness was know, and BofA already had a private bank division doing essentially the same work.

For Lewis to claim that Paulson insisted that the deal go through regardless makes no sense - Merrill was toast no matter what and no other institution had the capital to absorb their loses, even with TARP money. BofA, however, was in substantially better condition before the Merrill acquisition. So, why not just let Merrill collapse rather than enforcing the merger with BofA effectively destroying two financial firms?

Someone is lying and the obvious questions is when is Paulson going to testify, under oath?

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
381

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
379

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
307

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon