Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

ikuiku

Published Letters: 744
Editor's Choice: 26

Monday, June 23, 2008 12:12 PM

Of course they are related to one another.

Incidentally, solar power price parity has nothing whatsoever to do with the viability of plug-in hybrids. -- nkennedy

While it is true that current electric car technology (no even medium duty trucks at this point) offers a relatively short driving range, having a pollution free power grid they can plug into is part an parcel of the switch.

If all our automobiles became all electric overnight with our current electricity generating capabilities, we'd end up burning more fossil fuels to keep up with the astronomical increase in electricity demand, maybe enough to match the off set of retiring all the gasoline and diesel burning vehicles. Therefore, unless we have a carbon neutral way of generating electricity, an all electrically powered auto fleet would still be short of carbon neutrality, which is the whole point.

Monday, June 23, 2008 01:28 PM

With oil heading towards $150/barrel and global warming likely to render large parts of . . .

. . . the Earth uninhabitable for myriad species of plant and animal life in the next 20-50 years, the cost effectiveness of solar and wind power versus power generated by fossil fuels becomes moot.

It's entirely a matter of assigning fiscal and moral priorities. For example, how do you justify military spending at current levels when the U.S. is under no military threat (no, terrorism does not count because it's not a military threat)?

How do you justify paying government subsidies of any kind of industry not actively pursuing solutions to our current dependence of fossil fuel energy sources?

Why does a public good have to pay for itself let alone make money?

I figure we can address the problem now requiring a certain level of perhaps only short term sacrifice or inconvenience or continue to live exactly as we do now and sooner rather than later suffer from irreversible or unmanageable consequences.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008 08:53 AM

Yawn.

The Beastie Boys are just plain silly. Three middle-class Jewish boys as rappers? And everyone thought Vanilla Ice was lame. I mean isn't "Fight For Your Right" just the flip side of Twisted Sister's "We're Not Gonna Take It" without the make up?

I have nothing to say about his movie other than I'll never see it. But I find it disheartening anytime idiots like Yauch get additional public exposure.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008 09:19 AM
Original article: Stop the noise!

Living on the Upper West Side, . . .

. . . people with, apparently, cheap after market car alarms that go off when the temperature changes. Neighbors screaming obscenities and throwing eggs at the offending vehicles. God I miss New York.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:08 AM
Original article: Bully for Nancy Pelosi!

Perhaps.

But it would have been better for the country if she'd grown a pair when she became Speaker of the House. Then again, the same is true for Reed in the Senate. Their leadership in both bodies has been pretty limp-wristed and uninspiring. I can't think of a single significant issue where they have prevailed over the Rethugs and the White House.

Thursday, June 26, 2008 08:28 AM

I'm not sure which is sillier, . . .

. . . South Korean break dancers or Japanese Rastafarians.

Friday, June 27, 2008 08:30 AM

It's only a matter of time.

We are rapidly approaching the point were only certain commodities and specialty items and materials will be shipped long distances. As oil climbs to $200/barrel (I say six months), you will see the beginning of a resurgence in domestic manufacturing (and reverse engineering, of course). Nations with export manufacturing comprising a significant portion of their economy, like China, will begin to struggle. For the U.S., as long as we work towards greater energy self-sufficiency, the end of oil will be one economic cloud with a silver lining.

Monday, June 30, 2008 07:43 AM
Original article: Good to the last drop

Coffee is only as good as the roast.

And if you don't roast coffee darkly enough, it will taste weak and acidic, regardless of how allegedly special the beans may be.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 07:29 AM

I guess, given the false sense of outrage, surprisingly, on both sides . . .

. . . that if being a POW in an almost forgotten war (by 90% of the American public) from 30 years ago is a legitimate qualification for the presidency, then doing time in state prison must be a qualification for being a superior court judge.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008 10:14 AM

If Trader Joe's and Costco would follow suit . . .

. . . I could shop guilt free. Sort of.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008 09:09 AM
Original article: The meaning of Starbucks

Seconding B. Howell

For all you coffee snobs out there in the hinterlands (i.e., any place outside the PNW), if you have acquired a taste for good coffee, 99% of you can thank Starbucks.

When I was attending grad school in NYC in the early 1990s, there probably weren't six decent coffee shops in the five boroughs, with just one in Midtown (NO! Chock Full O Nuts doesn't count.) Most folks heading into work got their morning jolt, if so inclined, from those push carts that served a crappy "regular" in those blue and white Greek-themed cups. At this same time, Seattle probably had a dozen independent shops and Starbucks was just beginning its expansion. Portland wasn't far behind.

As B. Howell wrote, whether you trade elsewhere because you hate the evil corporate behemoth, Starbuck made America (and vast swaths of the rest of the world) safe for good coffee.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008 10:33 AM
Original article: The meaning of Starbucks

For every locally owned shop that may or may not have been put out of business . . .

. . . by the arrival of a Starbucks on the block (djavier's example), the fact of the matter is that with Starbucks making good coffee popular, literally thousands of smaller chains and stand alone coffee businesses have opened in the U.S., East Asia, and even Europe.

On my ten mile commute to work through the suburbs to the ex-urbs, I pass by just four Starbuck, one Tully's, and eight other drive-through or stand alone coffee shops. All of them post-date the existence/expansion of Starbucks (which as been in business for 30+ years) and, in all likelihood, exist only because of Starbucks' larger success. The same is true of the variety one can find of whole bean and ground coffee in a supermarket (at least here in the Great PNW).

I rarely patronize Starbucks because I, too, prefer to support independents. However, only someone who can't see the larger picture (and is perhaps less than 40 years old) dismisses Starbucks as not being instrumental in creating a gourmet, for lack of better term, coffee market.

Most Active Letters Threads

523

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
420

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
186

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
130

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?
103

Polanski moves from jail to ski chalet

The rapist director is granted bail, and one of his most vocal apologists celebrates

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon