Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 55
Editor's Choice: 1
I'm sorry, but she's an ass.
It seems ironic to me that on the day Richard Frey is in the news for his false autobiography, with the publishers offering returns to the readers who bought his made up life, we are now being given this anti-Clinton,let -Bush-off-the-hook-revisionist history. I feel like we are living in Communist China, where pictures of Mao appear and disappear. Can someone sue ABC for this?
As a follow up to this story, I heard Sean Hannity briefly this afternoon while flipping through radio stations. His lead story--all the missed opportunities to catch Osama by the Clinton adminstration. This is an orchestrated P.R. campaign which will put the Democrats again on the defensive. They will be in a position of weakness and will look like bumbling excuse makers. The Republican spin machine is genius.
Hmmmm...the voters as Britney and ...the Republicans as K-Fed???? A former back-up dancer who thought he could be a gangsta rap star? And who decided that he didn't need Britney any more because he thought he had all the answers? Let's keep the alimony to a minimum.
Joe sold his soul to Bush under the corner streetlamp because he thought George was Richard Gere and he was Pretty Woman. It was all a delusion, Joe, but you're stuck with it. No redemption for you.
At the risk of sounding like a dimwit--I have to say I am a little confused. I can't find the statistics to support this--but hasn't the number of troops in Iraq fluctuated before, and without all this hoopla and handwringing? Is 20,000 a significant enough number to be unprecedented? If this is true, can this just be a staged drama to let the former Bush cheerleading Republicans wash the blood off their hands before the next election? Or, will the troop increase cause such an uproar the the DECIDER will be forced to change his mind, and then blame the ensuing chaos on the failure to send more troops? I can't see anything clearly anymore.
....until the fat lady sings.
....Janice?????
I never read it, but doesn't James Joyce's "Finnegans Wake" end in the middle of a sentence, with no resolution? I may have to go find and read it.
I love Elizabeth Edwards, but the constant linking of any insult to an immediate request for a donation turns me off. What I don't understand is how the Edward's campaign lets all the talk about John being a millionaire with a big house go unanswered. At least he earned his millions--he didn't inherit his money or have the money and opportunlties handed to him. How about all the other million/billionaire candidates?
And how did we get so ugly? Why do we allow schoolyard bully level taunts to pass for political discussion? What kind of person takes Ann Coulter seriously?
And I don't see one genuine candidate in all this mess. They allow themselves to be wrapped in a putrid Darth- Vader-helmet-like cocoon made by their handlers,consultants,spinners,nip-and-tuck-and-wash-and-wax- polishers and marketing experts. I don't think they know or care what they stand for anymore--they just want to be elected. We are electing prostitutes.
Maybe he can get a job clearing brush for his Father-In-Law. It seems like the Bush ranch is infested with it.
Her dancing always reminded me of the poor guy in the old movie/TV Westerns who was forced to dance because someone was shooting at his feet. (Perfected by Cleavon Little in "Blazing Saddles.") Something mindless and souless and pathetic about it. Never sexy.
ELECTION 2008
Kathleen Willey suspects Clintons murdered husband
New book details evidence of 'smear' campaign orchestrated by Hillary
Posted: November 5, 2007
11:55 p.m. Eastern
By Art Moore
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
Kathleen Willey on "60 Minutes" in 1997
In a new book alleging a campaign of slander and intimidation orchestrated chiefly by Hillary Clinton, Kathleen Willey points a finger of suspicion at the former first couple for the death of her husband, who was believed to have killed himself.
Willey, who claims she was groped by President Clinton in the White House, acknowledged in an interview with WND today that she stands by the speculation she poses about her husband's demise in "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton," set for release this week by World Ahead Publishing, WND Books' partner.
Asked if she suspects her husband Ed, a lawyer and son of a prominent Virginia lawmaker, was murdered, Willey replied, "Most definitely."
"I'm having someone with a forensics background look at this, and I intend to pursue this further, now that these questions have been raised," she told WND, pointing to alleged discrepancies in the autopsy report.
Does she believe the Clintons were involved?
"I do have suspicions," Willey said, "yes."