Quit your whining. You've got no legitimate beef. You've let your political bias swamp your critical faculties. There are plenty of people on the right who do the same thing; I call them "rightwits", which is nice because "twit" fits so nicely in there.

You're the reverse side of the same stupid coin.

You're delusional. The mainstream media took weeks to discuss the Edwards scandal, well after the blogosphere had forced the issue. They suppressed it for as long as they could. The LA Times even directed its bloggers not to mention it!

You're spending too much time in a left-wing echo chamber.

Here's some news that didn't make it past Salon's filters -- McCain has eliminated Obama's lead since Palin was named as his VP candidate:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/04/opinion/polls/main4416798.shtml

Read it and weep, losers.

Until the Tracist is made to apologize for her racist slur on Obama supporters, she should not have any articles on Salon:

http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/04/14/obama_supporters/

This issue isn't going away.

Boy, are you an idiot. So CBS lied, and I lied through them? Did the other poll cited by another poster also lie?

You're a paranoid, delusional twerp, and your illusions are about to hit the wall like a tomato fired at a steel wall by a cannon.

The polls are real. The results are real. Only your reaction is artificial.

The next time you call someone a liar, make sure they actually lied, asshole.

He could ask her why the left thinks that the media should be the private army of the left.

Her answers would be speculation, but they would be interesting, and it's not as if Joan or the Salonistas will give good answers.

This thread is like watching libtard ants in a fight with feminitard ants. It's enormously entertaining and there's no way I can lose.

The left is clearly panicking over Sarah Palin's nomination and its remarkable effect on the voting public. Already you're making your excuses for losing, mostly involving black-helicopter conspiracy theories and insulting characterizations of American voters. Meanwhile, at least some of you are indulging B-grade sexual fantasies about her.

Keep biting each other! The more you fight, the better for America.

Wow. Just...wow.

Yeah, Subodim, no distinction at all, as long as you don't care about men.

Carry on with your hate-fueled religious war, folks. Make yourselves less and less relevant to the daily life of the republic. Keep generating the kind of quotes and stories that get Republicans re-elected.

Spew hatred of American voters, and do it in a publicly available forum. Demand that your candidate enact all of your fascistic fantasies when he is elected, including show trials for your political opponents -- and then scream and cry when he is not elected.

You're going to lose, and you're going to deserve it.

This will be fun to watch.

...and his kindred spirit and longtime associate, Barack Obama.

That's a direct association, not a second-hand slur like the one you're trying to sell. (Or do you mean that Sarah Palin's opinions are issued to her by her husband? How sexist!)

If Salon or the mainstream media were into real investigative journalism, the Ayers-Obama connection would be a juicy story indeed. Instead, all you can manage is weak cheap shots like this one.

Palin has libwits panicking, and for good reason. You know you're going to lose now.

Until Traister is made to apologize for her racist slur against Obama supporters, Salon should not publish anything written by her.

http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/04/14/obama_supporters/

This issue isn't going away.

But, conceivably, far in the future, some historian may quote us, to help prove that all Americans were not simple-minded murderous creeps, back in the first decade of the twenty-first century CE. That is one reason to watch your spelling, grammar, and punctuation here in Salon.

You're delusional. Absolutely delusional.

1. History will little note nor long remember anything said on Salon. When the people who pump money into this failed venture finally give up, within ten years it'll be an answer to a trivia question. If anything at all is remembered, it'll be a few of the articles. These comment threads won't even be a footnote.

2. Your self-righteous hysteria is amusing, but not really informative. Like a lot of Salonistas, you suffer from the Manichean delusion that you are Good and that those who disagree with you are Evil.

3. Salon has its share of creeps. You're one of them.

Which book is that?

If it's the one I think you're thinking of, you might want to check that quote.

...why not mention its widespread use in the Obama campaign?

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/mar2008/db20080314_121054.htm

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php

So cut the drama whoring and get a goddamned life.

Stupid letter, stupid response, stupid Salonistas who are no better off that the LW.

It sounds like twentysomethings and teens make the same stupid mistakes as their elders, but lack the capacity to be ashamed of it. That's not actually smarter.

From the sample in this article, I'd say the people who suck at the Net are women. The designated expert is male; the bunglers are female. What an odd stance for Salon to take.