Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
lambert
Published Letters: 62
Will Doctor Freud please pick up the white courtesy phone?
Of course, Bush's memnber is also “firm,” “strong,” and “stands up for America”. And torture is our "single most potent tool."
I know all about the strong father frame, but this is too much.
Glenn, awesome and truthful article, as usual.
Your question:
That is why -- as jarring as it is -- it is actually necessary to ask presidential candidates whether they intend to exercise the power to imprison American citizens with no charges of any kind.
I suggest that a better question, for the Senator, Congressperson, pundit, or candidate is this:
What is your plan to restore Constitutional government and the rule of law?
And if they don't even understand there's an issue here, well, they're not a candidate for you.
Further, if Democratic Party wants to make it clear that they want to restore Constitutional government, and not just take over and "moderate the excesses" of the authoritarian system that Bush is creating, then they could start holding hearings on matters like signing statements and warrantless surveillance. They aren't, and that greatly concerns me.
Impunity is characteristic of authoritarian regimes, especially in Latin America. Guy tortures you, then you see him a few weeks later getting a latte at Starbucks. "His hair was perfect."
Just guessing, but it could be that one little noticed aspect of the Latin aspect of Iran-Contra--and all the perps popped up again in the Bush administration, with promotions--is that Republican operatives found out down there how Latin American regimes worked, and decided they wanted that kind of power (and, specifically, the power to torture and disappear) for themselves.
Sort of a bringing-the-dirty-war-back-home style of thing...
Klein: Of course we're your betters. We come to your coffee shops and visit you almost every six months.
America: [Prolonged Bronx cheer followed by silence, shuffling feet as people walk away from the corporatist press.]
Suck it up and get on with the coup.
And I heard the PodCast, and thought it was great.
Glenn:
Thanks for the link on the 35,000 estimate -- we lowballed an estimate of 8,500 back in 2005. For those interested, here are some other posts on secret prisons from Corrente:
But we really have been all over this one since at least 2005, so may I suggest in addition to the Wilkerson link one or more of the following:
Two short summary (the best, I think -- this is the story some journalist should pursue. They start out the same -- repeat, repeat -- but end up differently.
http://www.correntewire.com/the_bush_gulag_where_are_the_bodies
http://www.correntewire.com/the_bush_gulag_where_are_the_bodies_press_wont_ask
Long summary (I wrote the short when this got no hits):
http://www.correntewire.com/the_arithmetic_were_thousands_from_bushs_gulags_disappeared
And the arithmetic posts:
http://www.correntewire.com/14_000_in_bush_gulags_not_just_100s_at_gitmo
http://www.correntewire.com/how_many_prisoners_are_in_bushs_european_gulag
http://www.correntewire.com/how_many_inmates_are_being_held_in_the_bush_gulag_at_stare_kiejkuty_poland
Here is the nut graf from the "Where are the bodies" post. It would be really nice if a journalist could follow up and get some answers:
Let's do some arithmetic on how many prisoners Bush is holding in his gulags.
1. We know that there are thousands of prisoners (estimates range from 7,000 to 35,000).
2. Gitmo holds only 500.
3. So, where are the missing thousands? The only alternatives I can think of:
1. They've been released
2. They're still in jail
3. They've been disappeared.
Barring divine intervention, the bodies of the missing thousands occupy time and space in this world. Where are they?
Which door would you choose? (a), released? (b), still in jail? Or (c), disappeared?
Then, of course, there's a the longstanding authoritarian confusion between imprisonment, torture, and sex (cf The Passion), but investigation of the dank recesses of the conservative psyche is a topic for another day. But for anyone who wants to get started:
http://www.correntewire.com/shays_r_pro_torture_says_abu_ghraib_just_a_sex_ring
Sayeth WaPo's coverage, translated:
Bartlett orchestrated the suppression of Bush's dereliction of duty in the Texas Air National Guard.
Good man to have around.
http://www.correntewire.com/republican_operative_who_orchestrated_successful_suppression_of_bush_awol_story_to_exit_west_wing
Let's try not to use terms that involve the word "licking."
That creates way too many unpleasant pictures, don't you think?
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
