Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

saintzak

Published Letters: 1871
Editor's Choice: 152

Monday, November 5, 2007 01:21 PM

"so whichever Democrat wins will be handed a piping hot war"

Or it could play into the GOP's hands and send a Rudy Guilliani to the White House, which is my fear. Once the bombs start dropping and the chaos begins Warrior Rudy will look better to alot of people than shifty weasle Clinton, deer in the headlights Obama or Kumbaya Edwards. Anyone of the three would be painted with the weak on defence brush once people are caught up in the fear and hysteria.

Attacking Iran is probably the Republicans best hope of retaining the White House, and maybe regaining the Senate. At this point I suspect a move against Iran is a power play. Any Republican swept into the White House on the heels of a raw and raging war in Iran would probaly turn to Cheney's crowd. Its their way of staying in power. They stay in control and the money faucet remains turned on full force.

I think the task is to stop Bush and the GOP from making that move. Kyl/Lieberman makes that even harder. All those Democratic Senators (I'm profoundly disappointed with you Dick Durbin) have no one but themselves to blame.

Monday, November 5, 2007 01:36 PM
Original article: A muted response from Bush

Look at the map

We're occupying Iraq, we're in Afghanistan, we're on the verge of war with Iran, we back every belligerent move Israel makes,, Turkey is fed up with us and is poised to go into Iraq, we've threatened Syria, Pakistan is blowing up in our face. Could we honestly have fucked up more?

The frightening thing is that we're facing an election that will be a profound turning point in our history, and let's be honest, all of the choices are at best uninspiring.

Monday, November 5, 2007 01:58 PM
Original article: A muted response from Bush

A Pakistani journalist* said this morning on "On Point" that the US is clearly party to the move.

And when Musharraf is eventually dangling by his ankle from a light post can you imagine the shit we'll be up to our necks in?

Tuesday, November 6, 2007 05:12 AM
Original article: Clinton and the men, again

BadgerBlue

Don't cry for me. Really only three have been piling on me. Go back and read their collection of posts. One notes, all three of them. None have been able to justify Clinton's stands (or lack of clear stands) on the issues, her shifty dodging and weaving, and ultimately her dishonesty in explaining her vote on Kyl/Lieberman which is my problem with her. Of course I certainly enjoyed throwing gasoline in their faces, but I have to say my favorite post was the idiotic comparison of Clinton's Senate votes on Iraq and Iran with candidates that weren't even in the Senate! That was truly profound.

Tuesday, November 6, 2007 05:39 AM
Original article: The Ron Paul phenomenon

Ron Paul scares me.

Certainly, his stand on the Iraq war and our increasingly imperial nature is compelling, but his other views are extreme. He seems to be capturing the attention of alot of people who normally would be considered progressive. We talk alot about the cult of personality. Its what gave us George Bush. I see Ron Paul no differently. Sure, its amusing to see him tweak the the other GOP candidates at the debates, but its frightening that he's getting so much support from people who are, in fact, unaware of his overall views.

In putting a hold on the FISA bill and threatening a filibuster should Reid move forward with it anyway was certainly a bold, and concrete, move by Chris Dodd. Its a shame it went by virtually ignored by the media and the public. I don't have alot of faith in the American public. I can't help but think alot of Ron Paul's sudden surge in popularity (and fund raising) is because he's a "character."

Tuesday, November 6, 2007 06:05 AM
Original article: Quote of the Day

Let's just put some glue traps around Iowa and be rid of him like any other rodent

I'm horrified, but I know a number of people who are big, BIG, Giuliani supporters. It really does scare. It seems unimaginable, but I think he would have a shot at winning. I just don't see any of the Democrats igniting much excitement over a broad spectrum. Giuliani would have his rabid supporters, and he'd pick up alot of last minute wafflers who go into the voting booth and let the fear tactics work their magic.

Character-wise he's completely different than George Bush, so he offers the "change" people want, but he uses the same scare tactics that Bush has used (and they do work). Personally, I'm hoping romney can get the nomination. He's so boring, he'd have a real uphill climb. Giuliani? I'm afraid he's got a darn good chance of winning.

Tuesday, November 6, 2007 06:14 AM
Original article: The Ron Paul phenomenon

Big Question: If Ron Paul runs as third party candidate, who does he harm?

The Democrats...no question in my mind.

Tuesday, November 6, 2007 08:04 AM

and what about the Iron Maiden?

"Congress will adopt a legal ban on waterboarding"

Does Congress have to go atrocity by atrocity banning individual tortures? Now waterboarding will be A-OK. What about tomorrow, removing fingernails? After all it isn't fatal, and leaves no grievous damage. I recall certain Japanese war criminals who were executed for among their crimes torture (including waterboarding).

I find it beyond comprehension that we find ourselves at this juncture, and I find it appalling that Republicans and conservatives have, once again, been allowed to frame the debate and take ownership of this issue and have suddenly transformed the US into a torture state. The next time planes explode into skyscapers, or a shopping mall explodes I hope people will remember this moment...then try to say, "They hate us because we love freedom."

The most alarming part is that the American people as a whole seem so ambivilant to this issue.

Tuesday, November 6, 2007 09:04 AM

stevio

"Bushit has created a monster that won't soon be diminished in it's standing."

Or has the monster created Bush? That's what I'm beginning to believe.

Tuesday, November 6, 2007 10:09 AM

he has called Oprah Winfrey a "new-age witch,"

What the heck would he say about David Bowie?!

Most Active Letters Threads

682

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
341

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
276

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon