Letters to the Editor
sesanders
Published Letters: 308 Editor's Choice: 18
-
Shapiro parroting the MSM!
[Read the article: An old-fashioned thumpin' in South Carolina]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]This is another Clinton-bashing media-driven piece of bias from Walter Shapiro. He just couldn't resist parroting the MSM!
Walter, I expect Pres. Clinton to campaign for his wife and to do it forcefully. No, I do not want Obama to get the nomination...that would absolutely ensure a Republican back in the White House in the general election. I'm not even sure Hillary can win, but she stands a better chance. Why do the Republicans praise Obama and strike at Hillary? Could it be they recognize that Hillary is a stronger force. I think the Democrats are frittering away their chances by not selecting a candidate whose appeal crosses all the lines. Too bad Edwards didn't catch on. He had it all and I'm still going to vote for him when the primaries finally get to my state, but he never stood a chance.
-
More Clinton bashing bias!
[Read the article: Bill Clinton: The Chris Matthews of South Carolina]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Of course, Bill Clinton is going to compare Obama to Jesse Jackson's win in South Carolina. It was an astute observation, a political analysis which Bill Clinton had the audacity to observe.
Glenn Greenwald, your anaysis is one more parroting MSM piece of bias! And I am not even a Hillary fan! I'm voting for Edwards who is the best candidate, the most winnable candidate, and the candidate whose progressive agenda matches my own!!!
-
Mind reading not useful in making decisions
[Read the article: Bill Clinton: The Chris Matthews of South Carolina]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]All the venom and vitriol, plus the mind reading of Bill Clinton by the media in general and Glenn Greenwald in particular does not convince me that Obama is a winning candidate. Nor am I convinced that press speculation about the motives of any candidate are genuinely useful in helping voters pick a candidate.
I fear Obama doesn't stand a chance in a general election but I will vote for him if he is the candidate. Even Bill Clinton promised to work for Obama if he is the candidate and I believe him, but Obama is not the best choice for Democrats. He is too new at the political game and let's face it: he is a media darling now but should he become the nominee, he will become the inexperienced candidate, the candidate with shady dealings in Chicago, the candidate who is naive and who wants to talk to our enemies rather than be strong against the evil forces just waiting to bring this country down. We'll be hearing about Osama Obama as well as savage attacks against his integrity. The repugs will have a field day.
I am not a Hillary fan but all the abuse flung her way in the last two days makes me want to protect her even though I am actively making contributions to the Edwards campaign because I like where he stands on the issues. That said, should Hillary become the nominee, I will vote for her and pray that her gender and all the demonizing that she has experienced will not ensure her defeat. I think that Hillary was correct to tell us all to take a deep breath. It is time to get back to the business of picking a winning candidate and set aside speculation about motives!
-
I like Ted but his endorsement does not make Obama a winner!
[Read the article: Endorsing Obama, Kennedy goes after the Clintons]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Since when have the Clintons demonized Obama? It is Clintons who have been demonized, had their minds read, and have been villified as racists...not the other way around. While I admire Ted Kennedy, my vote does not rest on Ted Kennedy's endorsement. I still don't think Obama can win in the general election. The Repugs will chew him up and spit him out! I am not at all certain whether Hillary can win either. That is why I support John Edwards who can win!
-
The bias on this site is getting to me!
[Read the article: Obama and race in California]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I don't know who Obama is. After his snub at the State of the Union (which Salon hasn't even mentioned because they are so biased for Obama) I am very doubtful that he has the maturity, polish, diplomatic skills, or popular appeal over a broad spectrum of people to be a winner. His campaign has issued several reasons for turning away, a fact that is suspicious on its own.
At least with Hillary we are not in the dark. She is a warrior; we know her about her warts, her ambition, her drive, her hard work, her tenacity and I personally think she is a friendlier person than Obama. I get just a little tired of hearing about race on Salon. Everything is race this, race that...Bill Clinton played the race card, Obama is a pitiful victim of race baiting, blah, blah, blah. It has turned me off the guy!
-
Dear Joan
[Read the article: Obama and race in California]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I am not going to waste any more heart muscle over this. If you want to think that there isn't any bias on this site, fine, but I stick to my guns. Greenwald's, "Bill Clinton the Chris Matthews, etc.", Shapiro whom I have always admired but he too had to chime in with reading Bill Clinton's mind, Traister's attack on Edwards...the only one who doesn't seem to come under the Salon bludgeon is Obama. He is always handled with kid gloves and too many articles seem to be about him lately. As for being pro-Clinton, I have been for Edwards the whole way, even to the point of contributing several times and I am very sorry to see him go.
-
The most electable of the Democratic candidates!
[Read the article: John Edwards exits with honor]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]What a skillfully written tribute to John Edwards who deserves every word of it! I wish his populist message had caught on but it didn't, and now we've lost the most electable of the Democratic candidates. I hope Edwards stays above the fray and does not endorse anyone until after the people decide who should be the Democratic nominee.