Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

shotgunwillie

Published Letters: 3

Sunday, November 30, 2008 12:19 PM

Could you comment on...

the FCC rules changes of 2003 that went largely unnoticed by the general public. In your opinion, is there any relationship between the government's propaganda efforts and MSM's complicity (esp NBC) in promoting the war in regards to these changes? If memory serves the consolidation of media ownership and the very threat of this type of deliberate manipulation was a primary fear of such changes.

http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/fccchanges.html

Thank you for your efforts.

Thursday, December 25, 2008 06:50 AM

Thoughts related to your recent addition

I found this quote in a Wikpedia article on Lincoln. The final sentences seem appropriate for the position you're advocating. I included a bit of a lead-in to give it a proper context.

Lincoln returned to politics in response to the Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854), which expressly repealed the limits on slavery's extent as determined by the Missouri Compromise (1820). Illinois Democrat Stephen A. Douglas, the most powerful man in the Senate, proposed popular sovereignty as the solution to the slavery impasse, and incorporated it into the Kansas–Nebraska Act. Douglas argued that in a democracy the people should have the right to decide whether or not to allow slavery in their territory, rather than have such a decision imposed on them by Congress.[17]

In the October 16, 1854, "Peoria Speech",[18] Lincoln first stood out among the other free soil orators of the day:[19]

[The Act has a] declared indifference, but as I must think, covert real zeal for the spread of slavery, I cannot but hate it. I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself. I hate it because it deprives our republican example of its just influence in the world — enables the enemies of free institutions, with plausibility, to taunt us as hypocrites — causes the real friends of freedom to doubt our sincerity, and especially because it forces so many really good men amongst ourselves into an open war with the very fundamental principles of civil liberty — criticizing the Declaration of Independence, and insisting that there is no right principle of action but self-interest.[20]

Many thanks for your efforts to keep the light shining in the dungeons of our failing republic.

Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:51 AM

While I generally admire your work...

...a modicum of modesty would mediate your megalomania. I find little purpose in quoting yourself so profusely, especially one who is thoughtful and talented. The siren song of your own voice will only serve to undermine the quality and substance of the good you provide. Cut it out!

All the same, I'm proud of your work and the service you provide. Thank you.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
421

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon