Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Amerigo

Published Letters: 2050     Editor's Choice: 76

  • The whole story is more interesting, though.

    [Read the article: Judge: Most males attracted to 1-year-olds]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    • My first reaction was to ask "what was the judge smoking"? But actually if you read the whole story, and preferably the transcript of all of the judge's remarks, then you see that

    it is not as bad as it seems.

    • What the judge was trying to say is that men may be attracted to women of all ages (1 to 100 was a poor example) and that the boundaries for what is acceptable are somewhat arbitrarily drawn. (For example the age of consent is 12 in Spain, 14 in Canada, 16 in the UK, and 18 in the US.) However, the judge went on to say, you just have to comply with the law where you live and you can't make excuses.
    • The man in question had been shopped by his wife and ended up getting sentenced to about 4 years in prison with 18 years of supervision. The judge did point out that during his career as a prosecutor and defender he had dealt with worse cases, including a man who raped 7-year-old girls and also mentioned that the defendant was an end user, not a producer of pornography.
    • I know many people will think that castration followed by an appointment with Old Sparky would be too good for him, but you have to have some kind of relativity built into a framework of sentencing so that worse crimes get worse punishments.
    • Somehow I doubt whether the wife will be marking his release date as a red letter day in her 2011 diary.
  • Sanjaya

    [Read the article: "American Idol" hits its dog days]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Never having watched American Idol, I decided to see what it was all about, and took 10 minutes out of my life to see Sanjaya performing on YouTube.

    OK, he can't sing at all, but he has nice teeth and would appeal to young girls. When Beatlemania was at its zenith in England in the early sixties of the last century, girls would go to the shows and scream continuously, and wet their pants, so they definitely were not listening to the singing.

    So there is no mystery, he is just getting the votes from young girls and their grandmothers.

  • "Civilized looking" suits

    [Read the article: How Iran played the hostage "crisis"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I think what the author meant was that the sailors looked suprisingly well-dressed, seeing that Iran is not known as a producer of business suits or as a country where this style of dress prevails.

    It is notoriously difficult to get a good fit in business suits unless they are made-to-measure, so the Iranians must have gone to some trouble to get the British naval "team" kitted out. Possibly this was helped by the fact that the hostages were all in good shape.

    All-in-all the Iranians have come out of this escapade in pretty good shape, making a stark contrast to those barbaric nations that torture their captives. Considering that this seems to have started with the Iranian gunboats making a piratical incursion into Iraqi waters, this is a remarkable outcome.

  • Trust, but verify...

    [Read the article: National journalists believe you should trust them]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I don't know what you mean by "illuminating". Although this guy's title is "Senior Vice President of ABC News" his resume actually suggests that he is a PR flack and not a journalist.

    If the story turns out to be wrong, will he accept responsibility and resign? I thought not.

    I am sure that ABC News has well-qualified reporters with unimpeachable integrity, but the same can be said of the BBC or Al Jazeera, and they don't necessarily always get the story right.

    The fact that the journalist behind the story got an award means nothing. Was this a Nobel Prize for Journalism open to all the journalists in the world and adjudicated by an international panel, or was it some kind of incestuous, in-house domestic award?

  • Glenn

    [Read the article: National journalists believe you should trust them]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Thanks for replying to my point about Schneider being a PR flack.

    I understand what you are saying, and you are quite right, but surely he represents the corporate party line rather than the point of view of on-the-ground reporters. While this certainly does illuminate ABC News' lack of public accountability, it does nothing to illuminate why their top brass considered that this story was accurate, or indeed whether they did truly believe it was accurate. That point is just as obscure as ever. And that is my point. The job of a PR flack is to obscure, not to illuminate.

  • These are the questions

    [Read the article: National journalists believe you should trust them]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    As another writer says:

    Is a source at least a "high-ranking Administration official*? A knowledgeabe NGO investigator on the ground in Iran**? A military or intelligence staffer on the hill or at the Pentagon or CIA?*** Heck, do they have an actual source, someone who works in the Iranian nuclear program, has a relationship with someone who does, or can actually see and is able to interpret appropriate satellite and other intelligence on this subject?

    Right on. These are the questions I would want to put to the ABC News press officer.

  • In Media We Trust

    [Read the article: National journalists believe you should trust them]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    People in different countries probably have different interpretations of what trusting the media means.

    To give one simple example, when I lived in Bermuda many blacks trusted the TV News,which had black presenters much more than the local newspaper, which was white owed, had predominantly white journalists, and even an editor called White.

    What we, the public, see persistently on US TV news and current affairs programs, presidential press conferences, Meet The Press etc. is journalists persistently failing to ask the obvious and necessary questions that we would want to ask.

    For example when Cheyney said that he knew the Iraqis had WMD and he knew where they were, journalists should have been jumping up and down demanding to know why this information was not given to the UN weapons inspectors. Or holding Bush's feet to the fire over his campaign promise in the 2nd presidential debate vs Gore:

    "Maybe I'm missing something here. I mean, we're going to have kind of a nation building core from America? Absolutely not."

Most Active Stories

Read More

Letters Help

Daily Delivery

Salon headlines in your mailbox