- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 2
Editor's Choice: 1
How does it serve the antiwar movement to expect every recently-converted, once-hawkish politico to wear a big, scarlet "I" (for Iraq? Ignoramus? Idiot? It's-about-time?) and beg in the town square for our forgiveness? Our goal is to enlighten every citizen to the unjust insanity of our adventures in the Gulf. If Newt and all of his newly aware friends don't wish to flog themselves for our amusement, that's OK! What we need is for all of these hawks to come to our side and bring the voters whom they hoodwinked into this with them.
We don't need grovelling, we need majority consensus so that we can eject the real ring leaders from office asap. Expecting full and complete public contrition from the converted hawks is counterproductive. In civil debate, once you've won a party over to your side, there is neither a need to humiliate them nor a necessity for them to do it for you. In the electoral climate in which we live, this is especially important. How can we expect Joe Republican on the street to listen to us if we excorciate his now-converted political icon for having changed his mind without doing so to the extent that we'd like?
Only the words to our national anthem are an American product. The actual music was lifted from an old English drinking ditty called "To Anacreon in Heaven." If we're going to get worked up about something, shouldn't it be the fact that the tune of our national anthem is not our own? No? Or maybe it is better to continue on our "blame brown people" path and let history sort itself out?
