Letters to the Editor
phread
Published Letters: 4 Editor's Choice: 1
-
Iatrogenic eugenicists promote circumcision
[Read the article: Male circumcision cuts HIV transmission]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Here is the reason that so many cut men are against routine neonatal circumcision, and why so many cut men cannot see the consequences.
The male and female prepuce contains specialized prepucial frenular delta nerves that trigger sexual arrousal when pulled or stroked. Known as the "Gee string" in males and the "G" spot in females, these nerves can be severed in newborn males to cause sexual dysfunctions to surface after puberty, including erectile dysfunction, suicidal depression, and delayed PTSD's surfacing after puberty as paranoid delussional schizophrenia.
Some circumcisers leave these nerves intact so as not to cause dysfunctions. These men cannot understand why others expereance dysfunction because they are not able to look at their frenulum statice in fear of being labled homosexuals.
When doctors cause sexual dysfunction in newborns(iatrogenic eugenics) this will greatly decrease the spread of HIV, but they cannot impliment their strategy unless they can convince people that the prepuce is a design flaw by Mother Nature.
In Africa hetero sexuals practice dry sex that causes micro rips in the male and female prepuce allowing entrance to HIV( just like Hep. C, directly into the blood).
During research as to how HIV enters our blood, we discovered our epidurmal Langerhan's anti viral cells concentrated in the prepuce that allow entrance to HIV and kill it with langerin proteins. Since most of us are not pathologist, all they had to do is leave the last bit of information out to convince people with religious convictions that they observe Abrahamic law.
To every action, there is an equal or oppisite reaction. If a parent sacrifices his sons prepuce, the son will grow up to sacrifice his son's prepuce, or the oppisite, murder/suicide.
The function of the prepuce is to protect, with Langerhan's cells, and to enhance reproduction desire with Meissner's corpuscles, specialized nerve endings conected to the frenar nerves. Be causious on who is presenting this misinformation to cause mass circumcision.
The function of homosexuality is to prevent rape of females, and over population by hetero sexual religions.
-
Creation without Evolution is Illogical
[Read the article: Inside the Creation Museum]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Let's start with the basics. New lives are created daily in two different ways, sexual and asexual. Asexual re-creates itself. Sexual requires the masculine and the feminine. The function of the masculine is to provide protection through genetic diversity, food and shelter. Masculine does not reproduce. Reproduction is synonomous with Re-Creation. The feminine is the creater of new life in asexual and sexual reproduction.
In human reproduction, the feminine XX and masculine XY chromosomes, 3X:1Y, pare and repair to form a new human. In humans, the masculine sex are born with feminine reminants, nipples and a prepuce. The function of the prepuce is to protect and enhance sexual desire. Its botanical sexual counterpart, the Calyx, has the same function. In creationist cultures they have to cut off the prepuce to prove their creation rightious according to Abraham according to Adam. In nature this is unnecessary.
Creation of life without a womb, asexual or sexual, is illogical. Claims that our creator is a masculine father are illogical and cause a schizm in reasoning. Once one can see that creation is a feminie atribute, then logically she evolved herself into us and everything else.
There are natural laws set in place at the beginng of whatever it was, that cannot be changed without an equal or oppisite reaction. Sometimes it takes thousands of years for us to repare the damage we caused by going against nature.
More time should be spent in caring for the least of us, the children, because they will become us. We may even be reborn as them as far as I know. Shame on those creationist for pumping all that money into their pride instead of the needy children. It's Hippocrasy.
-
What about drug resistant TB?
[Read the article: Inside the Creation Museum]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Did't that like just evolve in a matter of decades. People evolve new breeds of dogs and farm animals all the time. There's even species that are only female.
I think the real reason of denile of evolution is if it were correct, then Adam's creator would have been his Mother. She liked Adam's speaking abilities and decided to use Adam's or Adam's father's rib bone like phallus to create another and had Eve. Adam thought his sister Eve was made for him (simple misunderstanding)and got her pregnant. She miscarried and began to consume it as mamals sometimes do. She offered some to Adam , then they got caught by their Mom and banished from Eden. Adam turned his face from his creator/Mom and in revenge made a god in his own immage making females second class.
The moral of the story is to kick your full grown sons out of the nest before they get their sisters pregnant. When your mother tells you not to eat something cause it could cause death, listen to her.
It's not wise to screw with mother nature. Look what happened from this error in judgement. The original all powerfull masculine creator has fractured into many chards of theology.
I think the Apocalypse display should include seens of Iatrogenic Eugenics by forced circumcisions by religious zealots leading to Armegedon, when Jesus comes to wipe out the Christians, Jews and Muslems Hippocrates and Pharisees who practice ritualised routine neonatal circumcision.
-
Spy verses Spy, Terrorist vs. Terrorist
[Read the article: Psychologists to CIA: We condemn torture]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]It reminds me of the cartoons "Spy vs. Spy" replaced with Terrorist vs. Terrorist. The recipe to create a terrorist is you must be terrioized as an infant. In both Islam and Americanism they both commit genital terrorism on infants against their wills, causing a subconscious need to defend yourself against the invible enemy within. Why are they focusing on terrorizing terrorism instead of preventing future terrorists? If we outlawed genital terrorism of infants, then we would be able to pick out the prospective terrorists by examining their genitals. The AAP has a policy statement on forced genital terrorism which is very ambiguous. Does the APA have a policy statement on routine infant male genital terrorism? I know female genital terrorism has been outlawed here in the US thanks to the Clinton adm. Fredr