Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 2072
Who spoke to his "Heavenly Father" to make the decision to invade Iraq, resulting in the deaths of hundreds and thousands of innocents through direct and indirect means? -- Fraud Guy
Each and every suicide bomber, now and formerly in existence.
Yes I know, it's not the answer you had in mind, but it's still true. More importantly, that dialog about killing, from God to believer, happened on a regular basis long before Bush was pushed into dealing with his homocidal counterparts.
Translation: Bitch, bitch, bitch. Nag, nag, nag. And the alternatives you people have to offer were what exactly? Oh yeah, you'll be running against the GHOST of GW. Good luck with that.
liberals would not have to complain if the right wing wasn't so proactive in causing harm to the nation and its people. It views Americans as prey and opportunity, and their votes a license to steal. it is tough keeping up with them, they are into everything, like greedy undisciplined children inside a candy store, while the cashier is in the restroom counting the money he shortchanged from the store to make up for the slave wages the owner paid him.
LOL. Nice rant.... all one breath too. Why don't you tell us how you really feel?
"reality has a liberal bias" -Stephen Colbert
You forgot to include "well known". I know what Colbert's context is, what about yours? In what way does reality have a liberal bias? How does it fit in with your view of reality above?
Arne, I still think you'd make a fair unit of measurement for some aspects of the blogosphere, just not dickosity. It's probably a unitless ratio in any event.
-- Holly McLachlan
* Any agency can request a special prosecutor for any
reason.
* The investigation doesn't require resolution of the stated reason
for requesting a special prosecutor.
* Any conflicting statements by objects of special prosecutor
result in multi-year prison terms.
Does that about sum it up? Sure sounds like USSR style justice to me, but apparently Dems are down with it. I'll be encouraging Republicans to decide who among Dems "deserves" to be investigated.
Meanwhile back at the ranch, Democrat Obey has decided that he
is the decider of who gets portions of his own personal three
trillion dollar slush fund. No voting required, step right up. Why
didn't we think of that?
http://www.ombwatch.org/article/blogs/entry/3425/50
Authoritarianism for thee but not for me, eh Shootster?
-- Democritus
Not at all. I thought you guys didn't like Right wing Authoritarianism, but I stand corrected. I shall immediately draw up a list of folks the DoJ can snag in the investigation of non-crimes. How about Howard Dean for starters?
Arne Langsetmo:
Just a FYI, folks... .... day 37 of ignoring "bucky1". And I'm a
happier man for that.
I have no doubt he is the greater beneficiary. Feel free to extend the same protocol to my posts as well. Please.
At least something useful would have come of all the posturing, posing, hectoring, and lecturing. The really amazing part is the idea demonstrated here that GWB is responsible for nearly all the ills of the world. That is about as simplistic and wrong as one can get. I'm glad Glenn has pointed that out, but I think it's like trying to stop a runaway train.
You folks have been fed exaggerations, half truths, and innuendo, for Bush's entire term, and the liberal faithful continue to call out for more. Aren't you all going to be surprised when Democrats turn out to be worse. Heh.
Which reminds me, for those that aren't current, one congressman has taken it upon himself to determine which of 33,000 earmarks get funded, none of which will be voted upon. Essentially, the Federal Budget is his own personal slush fund. Is that the sort of thing that meets approval from this crowd? We shall see.
I don't know what you are or where you stand. I don't even understand what your point is. There are some wild ones out there. So what? Is Glenn "fringe"? Is Digby "fringe"? Is the marvelous Jane Hamsher "fringe". What aboout Christy and the others at Firedoglake? Are they "fringe"? If any or all of those are fringe then praise the lord and pass the butter. If they aren't then praise the lord and pass the butter. what is it that you are complaining about? -- Kitt
Have any of those mentioned above ever said anything positive about Bush? Anything? Nothing? No one can do that and claim to be moderate.
Hamsher and Co. took over the Connecticut liberal wing and had Lieberman tossed in favor of an unknown, only to have the general electorate pull the rug out from under them. That's extreme. She published a picture of Lieberman in blackface. That's extreme.
Denying that the Democrats in a Democratically controlled Senate led the way for military action is extreme. Advocating the pullout of all troops in Iraq without consideration of the consequences is extreme. Banning commenters for contrarian views is extreme.
Like it or not most commenters here are so isolated from real life in the liberal echo chamber, they now think they are mainstream, when they are indeed, fringe.
@L.W.M I notice you're still here, still trolling, still a hypocrite, still have nothing substantial to say, and still an idiot.-- healthyskeptic
When one person says it, it's an opinion. When two do, it's a consensus.