- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 9
my understanding is that the timelines in the curent bill are non-binding...so this is all just semantics...bush playing politics while troops die.
the real question, besides why aren't the dems pointing this out, is why isn't the f'ing press...isn't that their job???
the image of images for me was phil yelling from the "tower" of his house at tony. like a kid yelling at the bully from the protection of his mothers apron.
no matter the outcome there are a lot of threads to tie up.
i just can't see phil winning out...tony has to kill him, or maybe the fbi takes him down...and tony takes over his family.
...there are plenty of fish in the barrels where cheney does his "angling". but if you are fishing with him watch out for that hook in the eye...
...have just gone hunting with dick.
...what krugman thinks.
clinton voted to authorize oour little mis-adventure in arabia. no matter how you spin it that should be a career-ending mis-judgment. to stand there today and claim she didn't know what bush was going to do is ridiculous. i knew what he was going to do. if she knows less than me she certainly isn't qualified to lead this nation. i'm sorry mr. krugman but i will not vote for hillary.
...is not as important as judgment.
a lot of posts above talk about clintons experience over obama's. clinton, for all her experience, supported bushs war. that is a career-ender as far as i'm concerned. and is an impeachment of experience as a factor.
...what they said about john kerry. i say screw so-called electability.
