Letters to the Editor
Villemar
Published Letters: 349
-
@zipperhead
[Read the article: Hillary's bridge back to the 20th century]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The fact is: Obama's cornered the elite and intellectual and ultra liberal.
Damn, you're on to us. And we would have gotten away with it if it weren't for your masterful sleuthing skills. When I read your post in my limosine on my MacAir I almost splilled my latte all over my dashiki and birkenstocks.
If she loses the nomination, I'll write her name in. I won't vote for Obama. He's a phony
There's no way I'll vote for Obama.
Oh God no, please don't do that!!!!! I don't think we can win in November if we don't coddle your bruised ego. We can't risk a temper tantrum from a Salon Letter poster. Me and my fellow latte limosine liberal ivory-tower elitists probably should stop our jihad against hardscrabble, salt-of-the-earth blue collar working Joes like Hillary Rodham Clinton and her DLC supporters.
-
It's a Hard Knock Life
[Read the article: Why did Clinton wait to release her tax return?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Clearly, Pennsylvania Democrats will be able to relate to hardscrabble, salt-of-the-earth blue collar working Joes like Billary.
-
Joan is getting sloppier by the day
[Read the article: Americans more ready for a black president than a woman?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]...with her ham-handeded partisanry. Especially trying to showcase this so blatantly obvious contextual poll as if it had absolutely no context whatsoever.
If this poll were asked among those who had no access to television, internet and print media for the past two years it might be worth looking into.
-
$109 Million Bridge to Nowhere
[Read the article: Why did Clinton wait to release her tax return?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]...a bad investment all around.
-
Let's take a massive Friday Night News Dump
[Read the article: Why did Clinton wait to release her tax return?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]...right on MLK's assassination anniversary. Classy.
Glade won't cover up this foul stink.
-
If you can take one thing away from the 40th anniversary of MLK's assassination today...
[Read the article: Americans more ready for a black president than a woman?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Pity the bitter priveleged white woman.
-
@billcap
[Read the article: Why did Clinton wait to release her tax return?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Nah, it's just another Bush-league Friday Night News Dump. I'm sure the hired scumbags like Penn planned it out this way. April 11th didn't focus group well enough, plus nothing on the calender to possibly distract from the defecation.
-
This argument is very...
[Read the article: Americans more ready for a black president than a woman?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Ferraro-esque. Way to conceal a great big Friday Night News Dump. Pass the Glade.
-
@jebldmm
[Read the article: Americans more ready for a black president than a woman?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]But if you look with open eyes at the evidence, I think that you will see that most of the unfair attacks came from Obama's camp. He has been portraying Clinton as a racist, selfish, destructive candidate for many months. He started the attacks with the "Senator from Punjab" jabs and hasn't actually stopped, although he uses surrogates (often high level ones) for many of the attacks. Clinton has attacked, but generally on issues, competence, experience, not "character". Now, he implies that she "forced" him to get nasty (poor, baby) and that Clinton should drop out of the race (until he finally said otherwise, it was standard thought). Obama could have ended the "race" charges against Clinton anytime he wanted, but he chose not to. He chose to benefit from the race issue the same way he chose to benefit from association with a church whose pastor doesn't believe in America and he chose to benefit from association with Rezko. He's not a victim. He made his choices. Clinton made hers. He chose to win by attacking the character of his opponent. She chose to try to win by attacking the experience of her opponent.
Wow. Just...wow. This is the most insane projection I've seen in ages. Happy Opposite Day. Plus as an added bonus we get a liberal sprinkling of some good old Fox News bold-faced, straight-up lies.
Your very last sentence is the only correct statement you've made in your entire batshit rant.
I'm sorry you have decided to leave the Reality-Based Community. Good luck out there, and try not to choke on your own bile.
-
@katandmoon
[Read the article: Americans more ready for a black president than a woman?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I'm glad to see you're still standing despite the regular, predictable, tiresome barrage from certain ever ready to be stirred up Obama supporters. It's pretty obvious that the fact that YOU'RE a woman who dares to speak up against the Obama machine subjects you to the EXACT same kind of misogyny they direct at Hillary. Which tends to prove your point.
Oh Really. Prove that Joan Walsh, Senior Editor of Salon, is the VICTIM of MISOGYNY. Prove it. Citations please. I'm calling you out on this one.
Joan (and Hillary for that matter) is about as much a victim as Bernhard Goetz.
-
I'm very confused.
[Read the article: Americans more ready for a black president than a woman?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Are we Obamamanics supposed to be effete, latte-swilling, ivory-tower intellectual limosine liberals or are we supposed to be knuckledragging Neanderthal misogynists?
I'm confused as to what batshit projection we're supposed to be today.
-
@dragon00000
[Read the article: Americans more ready for a black president than a woman?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Obama does not have the credentials, experience, knowledge, political sauvy, nor has he run a business before, these are characteristics needed by a President, these are the basics.
Wow you really are a bona-fide, textbook definition of an idiot. Let's not mince words.
Why don't you read the effing Constitution of the United States of America for once in your sad life. Check out Article Two. Never mind, your barely literate in the first place....that would be throwing pearls before a swine.
The running a business shit really gets my blood broiling. Maybe you can write in Mitt Romney. Or write in Dick Cheney.
Its time for a woman, its damn time now.
In Pakistan they killed Bhutto because she was going to win, here in the USA, they kill Hillary because she can succeed and they are afraid of that.
Why are they not asking Obama to back down, why is that Hillary has to give up, give in, forget about it, stop running, why?
Because she is a woman and she can take a seat at the BACK OF THE BUS AGAIN.
This is perhaps the most insulting, idiotic thing I have ever read on the pages of Salon.com in the past ten years. Congratulations in condensing so much wrongness and drooling idiocy in so few words. You really win the prize.
If Reality and The Laws of Mathematics are not somehow erased over the next three months, I expect you screeching at the top of your lungs outside the conventrion in Denver. Say it now:
"No Vagina, No Peace!
No Vagina, No Peace!!
...etc."
If that doesn't work, you might want to foment a riot in Denver. Good luck with that.
Keep up the good work, you're like the Stoakley Carmichael of Radical Idiocy. I am very impressed you managed to get this far on the internets.