Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 698
Editor's Choice: 41
“They” (a small but visible subset) are angry because they carry unrestructured anger, and in lieu of adaptively reworking what underlies it, they sublimate anger by overidentifying with an avenging (fe)male who embraces aggressive power-seeking, antisocial behavior, militarism, and mass retributive killing in distant cultures, and whom is denied.
Do most of the guys you know and talk to like totally work at a Starbucks?
jk!
When that frakwad of a superego isn’t watching and shaming, just about all consensual sex seems to have a certain pull, doesn’t it? But very risky and dangerous for status and survival think me being penetrated and submissive, for male persons, is. Nobody’s bitch me want to be, in Big Patriarchy Hierarchy, then get pushed around just like females gender.
Co-occurring disorders: homophobia and social dominance orientation.
ultimately loss of self. Which reminds me of a really quite humorous joke:
Q - What’s the difference between a new, large SUV and a T-shirt that reads: “Please validate me. I feel very small and weak.”
A - About $40K, plus the T-shirt doesn't need oil changes.
See?
Absolutely, what those kids are doing is therapeutic and developmentally healthy in lots of ways, maybe why it resonates so nicely with the viewer. Differentiating from parents and family, choosing their own new social connections, using their bodies, building competence and learning to communicate and cooperate, experiencing the powerful archetypes of musical form, coordinated group movement and organic form, it’s all good.
As long as it doesn’t lead to sex!
1. Empathy is entirely unrelated to being a “softie” or weak, but is instead a perceptual and processing capacity for reading affect and other external cues to infer inner emotional/mental states of others, potentially allowing adaptive responses to needs of others.
2. It is absurd, counter-empirical, and in fact dumb-as-shit, given the geological history of differential selective pressures experienced by males versus females related to biological differences, to think that real, heritable differences in propensities and orientations to environment, including social environment, would not exist between men and women, and the type of evidence provided by Brizendine, Baron-Cohen and others confirm these differences. The type of picking at details engaged in by the Slate writers is inconsequential.
3. Anger is always secondary to vulnerability, fear. As Svutlana seems to be suggesting, many intelligent women appear to have introjected the cognitive/emotional scheme: “If I am different, I must be less than.” How distorted is that? And whom are they allowing to construct their beliefs and self-attributions? Sad.
4. Propensities and dispositions are just that. Humans are capable of self-directed growth, change, and moral development. As Steinbeck told us, the opportunity to transcend biology is what makes salvation possible.
after men and women stop submitting to domestication.
If the America I love and that loves me – that shining beacon of strength, and plenty for all, and freedoms, and Faiths, which is about to find its way, a new way, under the visions of a most eloquent and Progressive, smooth and inspiring Black Man, think of that! – if that unifying, race-discussing America was the total delusional piece of shit that Havrilesky says it is, then Mom and Dad - or at least one of my professors! - would have told me that years ago!
And they never did!
So Heather I hate you I hate you I hate you.
Plus you misplaced a modifier, in paragraph 4 or 5, or something, whatever.
Please make her stop.
Unless it’s Obama smoking. Or morbid obesity – that’s sexy, America, and soooooo rebellious.
Reality Check: Damn. Looks like Daddy was another dry drunk all along – compulsively constructing lies, cutting deals, breaking promises. Daddy is so scared of his dealmakers, he goes along with their gratuitous mass killing.
Daddy: “Check it out! I’m headed off to Church with my beautiful family.”
Salon: “Well, he certainly has read some books we’d proudly display on our shelves.”
Kids: “Dad is smart and knows how to get things done. We all read books in this big family! Who else likes Nietzsche?”
It’s a way that you connect with him in his space, so to speak, having given up or never creted your own, so to speak, afraid enough of losing the attachment that you feel obligated to rationalize away your deep discomfort “about consuming the meat of a creature I have not been brave or skilled enough to dispatch myself” in halfhearted ways that are so weak they are embarrassing to read.
It does, undoubtedly, as you needed to say, go back to how you connected with your father and mother and their kin, your blood, on their terms, in their spaces, no doubt unconsciously driving away inner experience in order to stay or become attached. “Self-justifying”, “fantasy”, and “delusions” are defenses against the anxiety created by inner dissonance, but never resolve it.
But seriously.
BobfromMass provided some very useful insights here, and there is a broader picture.
This was, after all, a 4th of July parade, a celebration of nationalism and patriotism – that is to say, an expression of forms of psychopathology driven by fear and the consequent need to express valuation of conformity, rigidity of thinking, external and hierarchical control of behaviors, safety in group inclusion, and marginalization and denigration of the “others” and of deviant, disallowed behaviors as threats to order and security.
In that context, should we be surprised to also see expressions of class- and gender-based aggression and marginalization aimed at uncontrolled sexual behavior? No one cares about the social costs of the pregnancies, or the best interests of the teens, but what is intolerable and threatening is that the young women would dare to take deliberate control of their own sexual and reproductive behaviors. The video of the parade was seamless – the national symbols, the militia firing in unison, the marginalization of strong, autonomous female celebrities, and the denigration of sexual choice - elements all one in the same, and all driven by fear.