Site Presented By
Saturday, Nov 7, 2009
Gams on Glass
Published Letters: 443 Editor's Choice: 8
Mr Lewis is NOT free to endorse whoever he so chooses. He is free to shut up and endorse whomever donates to his has-been, sugar-coated ass. That would be the Clintons. Look, I love Bill Clinton and I am willing to admit I don't hate his wife despite the fact that she is Joe Lieberman. And I am all for winning.. I would vote for Ms Clinton in a heartbeat if I had no other choice. We do need to stop the bastards.
Nonetheless, in the past few decades Lewis, who should be respected regarding his momentum in non-violence in the Civil rights movement(s)..... has become nothing more than a political operative paid off by his handlers in the democratic national committee. And not that there is anything wrong with that, whatsoever.
In short: anyone who jabbers on about Bill Clinton being a 'brother' has clearly passed their respective expiration dates. The man's faculties are corrupted. He badly needs to rest his jaws (although his brains seem to have made a space for preemptive sleep). I don't want to disrespect anyone, but: why don't we ALL just go vote for someone who may or may not expand the war into Iran?
I do like Paul Krugman, but I have been reading the following sentence, and can't seem to figure out how it is in a multi-million distribution paper:
"Graeme, who along with his sister received severe brain injuries in a 2004 car crash and continues to need physical therapy, is a beneficiary of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program."
Anyone?
The whole bit about 'credible'... absolutely unfathomable. It never happened like that. Two wings of the CIA having different definitions for specific terms as frequently used for business purpose, is not true by the very specific fact that such terminology is set out in numerous operations mauels given to incoming employees. All these people do all day long is discuss whether people and their horseshit stories are 'credible' and he expects us to buy this cacamamy story of his?
If you don't wanna take my word for it: Don't neverind the fact that a dozen intelligent people, irrespective of topic, sitting in a room for hours would pretty quickly come to the realization that their terminology was crossed. I think anyone who has ever gone to a job where meetings happen has managed to navigate this divide.
So: The author is a duper, duped, or just plain making things up. One and Three seem 'credible' since he claims the White House had no input after it has been cited by numerous individuals, that they essentially told Tenet they wanted data that would support their desire to go to war.
I am appalled at the lack of attention Gary Tennis has paid to mention of physical abuse. While single interactions of that type should not be immediate cause for separation or divorce, it must certainly be made clear that continuance of such behavior will be... and the writer must be willing to follow through. This lack of attention to this fact of physical abuse is rather indicative to me of Mr Tennis' own problems; he repeatedly seem unable to take male writers at face value and in such cases as this, devalues the worth of the individual.
Now, that said, it is clear the time is nigh for the writer to MURDER his wife. This is the only solution. MURDER has solved any number of worldly problems and we can surely see how the situation would be dramatically improved should this wife be disappeared, or get hit-and-runned down. Rather than a psychotic, loony women jabbering on endlessly about romances the author surely now wishes he HAD pursued, and waiting for the moment to shiv him in the ribs with a plastic fork, he could be footloose and fancy free, dining on herbavore kidneys at a steak-house in Kenya -- bill footed by insurance money dutifully paid out by the guv-ment.
Actually, some of us ought remember that Bush, when queried in 2000, what he was currently reading, he said a biography of Dean Acheson.
Hence, we can see: at least Busho listens to his handlers.
You're a grown ass man. I told my highly religious mother I was an atheist in front of my CCD teacher. Hilariously this lead her to cry at my subsequent doctor's appointment. Good times and better memories.
Now, as I said, you are a grown ass man (man?) and being such means you need make your targets cry in grown ass man ways. You MUST MURDER one of your classmates. It is the only way to make clear your intentions to retain your atheistic rights. Did not our Founding Fathers, having hoisted the BS 'deist' flag, a fugazi if there ever was one, then make sure to pitchfork the ominous John Bull? A syringe to the neck should incapacitate the godly loon. Then back you your place to store the body in a trunk behind the wall. Ira Einhorn wasn't a PhD boy for nothing. The man knew what to do. MURDER one, and be done with it. Although, remember to learn from Ira's mistakes.... you ought not leave the corpse rotting behind the walls for too long. Tends to attract rats... and Pigs!
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The Maine fight was supposed to be the dress rehearsal for repealing California's Prop. 8 -- but gay marriage lost
Once one obtains Seriousness credentials in the Washington media, they are irrevocable no matter one's conduct.
Salon headlines in your mailbox
